Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21216910›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Lambda red-mediated genetic modification of the insect endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius.

Mauricio H Pontes, Colin Dale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Single-step genome engineering in the bee gut symbiontbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Diversity of Midgut Bacteria among Wild-CaughtBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endosymbiont evolution: predictions from theory and surprises from genomes.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mauricio H PontesDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Colin Dale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current study, we adapted and optimized the lambda Red recombineering strategy to genetically manipulate the fastidious insect endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius. This work greatly facilitates the application of genetics to the study of insect symbionts and should also prove useful in the context of long-awaited paratransgenic insect control strategies.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsBacteriophage lambdaDNA, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeGenetic EngineeringGenetics, MicrobialInsectaViral ProteinsDNA, BacterialViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21216910
PMCPMC3067283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.