Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21216255›Full record

ArticleMutation research2011

γH2AX foci as a measure of DNA damage: a computational approach to automatic analysis.

Alesia N Ivashkevich, Olga A Martin, Andrea J Smith, Christophe E Redon, William M Bonner, Roger F Martin, Pavel N Lobachevsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RAD51 Foci as a Biomarker Predictive of Platinum Chemotherapy Response in Ovarian Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Unraveling the Molecular Impact of Sperm DNA Damage on Human Reproduction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alesia N IvashkevichTrescowthick Research Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrew's Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia.
Olga A Martin
Andrea J Smith
Christophe E Redon
William M Bonner
Roger F Martin
Pavel N Lobachevsky
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Studies of Histone Functions in Chromatin; H2AX and DNA DSBsZIABC006140 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BONNER, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2015
$7.8M
Studies of Histone Functions in Chromatin; H2AX and DNA DSBsZ01BC006140 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BONNER, WILLIAM · 1996 to 2008
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006140Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC006140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The γH2AX focus assay represents a fast and sensitive approach for the detection of one of the critical types of DNA damage - double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by various cytotoxic agents including ionising radiation. Apart from research applications, the assay has a potential in clinical medicine/pathology, such as assessment of individual radiosensitivity, response to cancer therapies, as well as in biodosimetry. Given that generally there is a direct relationship between numbers of microscopically visualised γH2AX foci and DNA DSB in a cell, the number of foci per nucleus represents the most efficient and informative parameter of the assay. Although computational approaches have been developed for automatic focus counting, the tedious and time consuming manual focus counting still remains the most reliable way due to limitations of computational approaches. We suggest a computational approach and associated software for automatic focus counting that minimises these limitations. Our approach, while using standard image processing algorithms, maximises the automation of identification of nuclei/cells in complex images, offers an efficient way to optimise parameters used in the image analysis and counting procedures, optionally invokes additional procedures to deal with variations in intensity of the signal and background in individual images, and provides automatic batch processing of a series of images. We report results of validation studies that demonstrated correlation of manual focus counting with results obtained using our computational algorithm for mouse jejunum touch prints, mouse tongue sections and human blood lymphocytes as well as radiation dose response of γH2AX focus induction for these biological specimens.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHistonesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJejunumLymphocytesMiceTongueValidation Studies as TopicH2AX protein, humanHistones

Identifiers

PMID21216255
PMCPMC3101310
OpenAlexW2044197339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.