Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21214510›Full record

ReviewAnti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry2010

Focal adhesion kinase as a cancer therapy target.

Vita M Golubovskaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of potent FAK-degrading PROTACs.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell adhesion tunes inflammatory TPL2 kinase signal transduction.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Article
  12. FAK in Cancer: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vita M GolubovskayaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. Vita.Golubovskaya@roswellpark.org
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

FOCAL ADHESION KINASE--TUMOR BIOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICSR01CA065910 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARLOWE, TIMOTHY A · 1996 to 2019
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA065910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase that resides at the sites of focal adhesions. The 125 kDa FAK protein is encoded by the FAK gene located on human chromosome 8q24. Structurally, FAK consists of an amino-terminal regulatory FERM domain, a central catalytic kinase domain, and a carboxy-terminal focal adhesion targeting domain. FAK has been shown to be an important mediator of cell adhesion, growth, proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and migration, all of which are often disrupted in cancer cells. Normal tissues have low expression of FAK, while primary and metastatic tumors significantly overexpress this protein. This review summarizes expression of FAK by immunohistochemical staining in different tumor types and presents several FAK inhibition therapy approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesHumansNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21214510
PMCPMC3267551
OpenAlexW2092455965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.