Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21214251›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2011

Sequence tagging reveals unexpected modifications in toxicoproteomics.

Surendra Dasari, Matthew C Chambers, Simona G Codreanu, Daniel C Liebler, Ben C Collins, Stephen R Pennington, William M Gallagher, David L Tabb

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Demystifying PTM Identification Using MODplus: Best Practices and Pitfalls.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The SEQUEST family tree.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Surendra DasariDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0006, United States.
Matthew C Chambers
Simona G Codreanu
Daniel C Liebler
Ben C Collins
Stephen R Pennington
William M Gallagher
David L Tabb

Funding

Protein Adducts and Proteome Profiles in Oxidative StressP01ES013125 · NIEHS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PORTER, NED ALLEN · 2005 to 2012
$12.6M
Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for CancerU24CA126479 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2006 to 2010
$7.9M
New Proteomic Algorithms to Identify Mutant or Modified ProteinsR01CA126218 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI TABB, DAVID L · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA126218NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126479NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES013125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicoproteomic samples are rich in posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins. Identifying these modifications via standard database searching can incur significant performance penalties. Here, we describe the latest developments in TagRecon, an algorithm that leverages inferred sequence tags to identify modified peptides in toxicoproteomic data sets. TagRecon identifies known modifications more effectively than the MyriMatch database search engine. TagRecon outperformed state of the art software in recognizing unanticipated modifications from LTQ, Orbitrap, and QTOF data sets. We developed user-friendly software for detecting persistent mass shifts from samples. We follow a three-step strategy for detecting unanticipated PTMs in samples. First, we identify the proteins present in the sample with a standard database search. Next, identified proteins are interrogated for unexpected PTMs with a sequence tag-based search. Finally, additional evidence is gathered for the detected mass shifts with a refinement search. Application of this technology on toxicoproteomic data sets revealed unintended cross-reactions between proteins and sample processing reagents. Twenty-five proteins in rat liver showed signs of oxidative stress when exposed to potentially toxic drugs. These results demonstrate the value of mining toxicoproteomic data sets for modifications.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyCrystallinsDatabases, ProteinHistonesHumansLiverProteinsRatsToxicogeneticsCrystallinsHistonesProteins

Identifiers

PMID21214251
PMCPMC3042045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.