Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21214060›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

Upsurge of chlamydial reinfection in a large Canadian city: an indication of suboptimal chlamydia screening practices?

Mélissa Généeux, Pascale Leclerc, Lucie Bédard, Robert Allard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inequities inAmerican journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mélissa GénéeuxDépartement des sciences de la santé communautaire, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4. melissa.genereux@usherbrooke.ca
Pascale Leclerc
Lucie Bédard
Robert Allard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGiven the limited knowledge on chlamydial reinfection (CR) in Canada, we examined the extent and predictors of CR in Montréal, a large Canadian city.

methodsWe retrospectively studied all Montréal residents aged > or =10 years for whom > or =1 laboratory-confirmed chlamydial infection was reported to the public health department between 1988 and 2007 (n = 44,580). Each person was passively followed for two years after baseline infection or until reinfection. Socio-demographic factors and histories of other notifiable diseases were examined as potential predictors. Cox multivariate regression was used to model the time to CR. Survival analyses were stratified by age group (<25 vs. > or =25 years).

resultsWe estimated an overall two-year CR rate of 6.4%, an incidence density of 3.5 per 100 person-years, and a median time to reinfection of nine months. CR significantly increased over time. Among persons <25 years, reinfection was significantly more likely among females [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.58] and younger participants (10-14 years: AHR: 2.98; 15-19 years: AHR: 1.81). Residing within the South Central sector was deleterious for six months following initial infection after which it became protective. Among persons > or =25 years, a history of sexually transmitted infections increased the risk of reinfection (AHR: 1.79).

conclusionCR is a significant and growing problem in Montreal. The current recommendation for a single repeat screening six months posttreatment might be usefully complemented with additional screenings. Our results also underscore the importance of screening high-risk populations, particularly young women.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChlamydia InfectionsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleQuebecRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSex DistributionSexual BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21214060
PMCPMC6974194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.