Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21212778›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2011

Isolation of circular yeast artificial chromosomes for synthetic biology and functional genomics studies.

Vladimir N Noskov, Ray-Yuan Chuang, Daniel G Gibson, Sun-Hee Leem, Vladimir Larionov, Natalay Kouprina

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vladimir N NoskovThe J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Ray-Yuan Chuang
Daniel G Gibson
Sun-Hee Leem
Vladimir Larionov
Natalay Kouprina
J. Craig Venter Institute · USDong-A University · KRNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Study of hereditary prostate cancer and human artificial chromosomesZIABC010413 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LARIONOV, VLADIMIR · 2009 to 2025
$31.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) provide significant advantages for cloning and manipulating large segments of genomic DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, it has been difficult to exploit these advantages, because circular YACs are difficult to isolate and purify. Here we describe a method for purification of large circular YACs that is more reliable compared with previously described protocols. This method has been used to purify YACs up to 600 kb in size. The purified YAC DNA is suitable for restriction enzyme digestion, DNA sequencing and functional studies. For example, YACs carrying full-size genes can be purified from yeast and used for transfection into mammalian cells or for the construction of a synthetic genome that can be used to produce a synthetic cell. This method for isolating high-quality YAC DNA in microgram quantities should be valuable for functional and synthetic genomic studies. The entire protocol takes ∼3 d to complete.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesChromosomes, Artificial, YeastCloning, MolecularDNA, FungalGenomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID21212778
PMCPMC7380547
OpenAlexW2027008711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.