Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21212645›Full record

ArticleCytogenetic and genome research2011

Interstitial deletion of proximal 8q including part of the centromere from unbalanced segregation of a paternal deletion/marker karyotype with neocentromere formation at 8p22.

R D Burnside, J Ibrahim, C Flora, S Schwartz, J H Tepperberg, P R Papenhausen, P E Warburton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cytogenetic and genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R D BurnsideLaboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. burnsir@labcorp.com
J Ibrahim
C Flora
S Schwartz
J H Tepperberg
P R Papenhausen
P E Warburton
Leco Corporation (United States) · USSt. Joseph’s Children’s Hospital · USTriangle · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

The repetitive DNA structure of the human genomeR01GM072084 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WARBURTON, PETER E · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072084NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM072084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe 'McClintock mechanism' of chromosome breakage and centromere misdivision, in which a deleted chromosome with its concomitant excised marker or ring chromosome is formed, has been described in approximately one dozen reports. We report a case of a girl with short stature, developmental delay, and dysmorphic features.

methodsAnalysis was performed on the proband and father using cytogenetic chromosome analysis and the Affymetrix 6.0 SNP microarray. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a chromosome 8 alpha-satellite probe and immunofluorescence with antibodies to CENP-C were used to examine the centromere positions in these chromosomes.

resultsAn abnormal chromosome 8 with a cytogenetically visible deletion was further defined by SNP array as a 10.6-Mb deletion from 8q11.1→q12.1. FISH with a chromosome 8 alpha-satellite probe demonstrated that the deletion removed a significant portion of the pericentromeric alpha-satellite repeat sequences and proximal q arm. The deleted chromosome 8 appeared to have a constriction at 8p22, suggesting the formation of a neocentromere, even though alpha-satellite sequences still appeared at the normal location. Chromosome analysis of the phenotypically normal father revealed the same deleted chromosome 8, as well as an apparently balancing mosaic marker chromosome 8. FISH studies revealed that the majority of the chromosome 8 alpha-satellite DNA resided in the marker chromosome. Immunofluorescence studies with antibodies to CENP-C, a kinetochore protein, proved the presence of a neocentromere at 8p22. The excision of the marker from the deleted chromosome 8 likely necessitated the formation of a new kinetochore at the 8p22 neocentromere to stabilize the chromosome during mitosis.

conclusionThis case clearly illustrates the utilization of classic cytogenetics, FISH, and array technologies to better characterize chromosomal abnormalities and provide information on recurrence risks. It also represents a rare case where a neocentromere can form even in the presence of existing alpha-satellite DNA.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome DeletionCentromereChildChromosome BandingChromosome SegregationChromosomes, Human, Pair 8Congenital AbnormalitiesDNA, SatelliteFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKinetochoresMalePhenotypeDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID21212645
PMCPMC3064936
OpenAlexW2046989155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.