Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21212322›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2011

Human tears contain a chemosignal.

Shani Gelstein, Yaara Yeshurun, Liron Rozenkrantz, Sagit Shushan, Idan Frumin, Yehudah Roth, Noam Sobel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reactivation-induced motor skill learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fluid Ejections in Nature.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  17. Emotional expression in human odour.Evolutionary human sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shani GelsteinDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Yaara Yeshurun
Liron Rozenkrantz
Sagit Shushan
Idan Frumin
Yehudah Roth
Noam Sobel
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional tearing is a poorly understood behavior that is considered uniquely human. In mice, tears serve as a chemosignal. We therefore hypothesized that human tears may similarly serve a chemosignaling function. We found that merely sniffing negative-emotion-related odorless tears obtained from women donors induced reductions in sexual appeal attributed by men to pictures of women's faces. Moreover, after sniffing such tears, men experienced reduced self-rated sexual arousal, reduced physiological measures of arousal, and reduced levels of testosterone. Finally, functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed that sniffing women's tears selectively reduced activity in brain substrates of sexual arousal in men.

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsSexual BehaviorAdultAffectBrainDouble-Blind MethodFaceFemaleHumansHypothalamusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOdorantsPheromones, HumanSalivaPheromones, HumanTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID21212322
OpenAlexW2069493503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.