Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21210082›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2011

Accounting for racial/ethnic variation in bone mineral content and density: the competing influences of socioeconomic factors, body composition, health and lifestyle, and circulating androgens and estrogens.

T G Travison, G R Chiu, J B McKinlay, A B Araujo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Muscle-Bone Unit in Male Elite Soccer Players Aged 14-19.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Bone Health and Outcomes in the United States.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Review
  6. Racial and gender differences in the relationship between sarcopenia and bone mineral density among older adults.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  7. Racial and gender differences in the relationship between sarcopenia and bone mineral density among older adults.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in adults by race/ethnicity and gender: the Louisiana osteoporosis study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cohort profile: the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey.International journal of epidemiology · 2014
    Article
  15. A secular increase in BMD in Chinese women.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2014
    Article
  16. Socioeconomic status, race, and bone turnover in the Midlife in the US Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T G TravisonSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
G R Chiu
J B McKinlay
A B Araujo
New England Research Institutes · USBoston University · USNew England Research (United States) · US

Funding

Trajectories of Urologic Disease: Follow-up of BACHU01DK056842 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, JOHN B · 2001 to 2011
$15.7M
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Fall Risk and Bone Strength Among MenR01AG020727 · NIA · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI BARTALI, BENEDETTA · 2002 to 2013
$6.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020727NIA NIH HHS R01AG020727NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK056842NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK056842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe relative importance of various contributors to racial/ethnic variation in BMC/BMD is not established. Using population-based data, we determined that body composition differences (specifically skeletal muscle and fat mass) are among the strongest contributors to these variations.

introductionRacial/ethnic variation in fracture risk is well documented, but the mechanisms by which such heterogeneity arises are poorly understood. We analyzed data from black, Hispanic, and white men enrolled in the Boston Area Community Health/Bone (BACH/Bone) Survey to determine the contributions of risk factors to racial/ethnic differences in bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD).

methodsIn a population-based study, BMC, BMD, and body composition were ascertained by DXA. Socioeconomic status, health history, and dietary intake were obtained via interview. Hormones and markers of bone turnover were obtained from non-fasting blood samples. Multivariate analyses measured percentage reductions in estimated racial/ethnic differences in BMC/BMD, accompanying the successive removal of covariates from linear regression models.

resultsBlack men demonstrated greater BMC than their Hispanic and white counterparts. At the femoral neck, adjustment for covariables was sufficient to reduce these differences by 46% and 35%, respectively. While absolute differences in BMC were smaller at the distal radius than femoral neck, the proportionate reductions in racial/ethnic differences after covariable adjustment were comparable or greater. Multivariate models provided evidence that lean and fat mass, serum 25(OH)D, osteocalcin, estradiol, and aspects of socioeconomic status influence the magnitude of racial/ethnic differences in BMC, with lean and fat mass providing the strongest effects. Results for BMD were similar, but typically of lesser magnitude and statistical significance.

conclusionsThese cross-sectional analyses demonstrate that much of the racial/ethnic heterogeneity in measures of bone mass and density can be accounted for through variation in body composition, diet, and socio-demographic factors.

Indexed as

Black PeopleHispanic or LatinoWhite PeopleAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAndrogensBody CompositionBone DensityCross-Sectional StudiesEstrogensFemur NeckHealth StatusHumansLife StyleMaleAndrogensEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID21210082
PMCPMC3123392
OpenAlexW2028234317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.