Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21209613›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2011

Effects of direct- and indirect-acting serotonin receptor agonists on the antinociceptive and discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rhesus monkeys.

Jun-Xu Li, Wouter Koek, Kenner C Rice, Charles P France

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun-Xu LiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Wouter Koek
Kenner C Rice
Charles P France

Funding

Medicinal Chemistry of Drugs Acting on Central and Peripheral Opioid ReceptorsZIADA000527 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI RICE, KENNER · 2009 to 2025
$23.2M
DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS OF OPIOID WITHDRAWALR01DA005018 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FRANCE, CHARLES P · 1988 to 2025
$8.8M
Behavioral Pharmacology of Drug DependenceK05DA017918 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FRANCE, CHARLES P · 2005 to 2014
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDA NIH HHS DA005018NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA017918NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA17918NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serotonergic (5-HT) systems modulate pain, and drugs acting on 5-HT systems are used with opioids to treat pain. This study examined the effects of 5-HT receptor agonists on the antinociceptive and discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in monkeys. Morphine increased tail-withdrawal latency in a dose-related manner; 5-HT receptor agonists alone increased tail-withdrawal latency at 50 °C but not 55 °C water. The antinociceptive effects of morphine occurred with smaller doses when monkeys received an indirect-acting (fenfluramine) or direct acting (8-OH-DPAT, F13714, buspirone, quipazine, DOM, and 2C-T-7) agonist. The role of 5-HT receptor subtypes in these interactions was confirmed with selective 5-HT(1A) (WAY100635) and 5-HT(2A) (MDL100907) receptor antagonists. None of the 5-HT drugs had morphine-like discriminative stimulus effects; however, fenfluramine and 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine and this attenuation was prevented by MDL100907. The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. Thus, 5-HT receptor agonists increase the potency of morphine in an assay of antinociception, even under conditions where 5-HT agonists are themselves without effect (ie, 55 °C water), without increasing (and in some cases decreasing) the potency of morphine in a drug discrimination assay. Whereas 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists increase the potency of morphine for antinociception at doses that have no effect on the rate of operant responding, 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists increase the potency of morphine only at doses that eliminate operant responding. These data suggest that drugs acting selectively on 5-HT receptor subtypes could help to improve the use of opioids for treating pain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantDiscrimination, PsychologicalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsFenfluramineFluorobenzenesHot TemperatureHumansHyperalgesiaMacaca mulattaMaleMorphineNarcoticsDrug CombinationsFenfluramineFluorobenzenesMorphineNarcoticsPiperidinesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin AntagonistsSerotonin Receptor Agonistsvolinanserin

Identifiers

PMID21209613
PMCPMC3077263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.