Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21209397›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2011

Randomized phase II trial of sulindac, atorvastatin, and prebiotic dietary fiber for colorectal cancer chemoprevention.

Paul J Limburg, Michelle R Mahoney, Katie L Allen Ziegler, Stephen J Sontag, Robert E Schoen, Richard Benya, Michael J Lawson, David S Weinberg, Elena Stoffel, Michael Chiorean and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Radiotherapy and the gut microbiome: facts and fiction.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer by Dietary Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paul J LimburgMayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. limburg.paul@mayo.edu
Michelle R Mahoney
Katie L Allen Ziegler
Stephen J Sontag
Robert E Schoen
Richard Benya
Michael J Lawson
David S Weinberg
Elena Stoffel
Michael Chiorean
Russell Heigh
Joel Levine
Gary Della'Zanna
Luz Rodriguez
Ellen Richmond
Christopher Gostout
Sumithra J Mandrekar
Thomas C Smyrk
Cancer Prevention Network
University of Connecticut · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

ZESTRIL VS. VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONM01RR000585 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 1985 to 2006
$30.4M
PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS OF CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS -261035000N01CN035000 · CN · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LIMBURG, PAUL J · 1985 to 2006
–
NCI NIH HHS N01 CN003500NCI NIH HHS N01 CN035000NCI NIH HHS N01-CN-35000NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000585NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulindac, atorvastatin, or prebiotic dietary fiber may reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. However, clinical trial data are currently limited. We conducted a randomized, phase II chemoprevention trial involving subjects 40 years or older, with previously resected colon cancer or multiple/advanced colorectal adenomas. Magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE) was performed to identify and characterize rectal aberrant crypt foci (ACF); eligibility criteria required five or more rectal ACFs at baseline. Intervention assignments were as follows: (a) atorvastatin 20 mg qd; (b) sulindac 150 mg bid; (c) oligofructose-enriched inulin (as ORAFTI®Synergy1) 6 gm bid; or (d) control (maltodextrin) 6 gm bid, for 6 months. Percent change in rectal ACF number (%ΔACF) within arm was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included changes in proliferation (Ki67) and apoptosis (caspase-3), as measured from normal mucosa biopsy samples. Among 85 eligible randomized subjects, 76 (86%) completed the trial per protocol. The median (range) of rectal ACF was 9 (5-34) and 8 (0-37) at baseline and postintervention, respectively. The median (SD) for %ΔACF was 5.6 (-69% to 143%), -18.6 (-83% to 160%), -3.6 (-88% to 83%), and -10.0 (-100% to 117%) in the atorvastatin, sulindac, ORAFTI®Synergy1 and control arms, respectively. Neither within-arm (P = 0.12-0.59) nor between-arm (P = 0.30-0.92) comparisons of %ΔACF were statistically significant. The active and control interventions also seemed to have similar effects on mucosal proliferation and apoptosis (P > 0.05 for each comparison). Data from this multicenter, phase II trial do not provide convincing evidence of CRC risk reduction from 6-month interventions with atorvastatin, sulindac, or ORAFTI®Synergy1, although statistical power was limited by the relatively small sample size.

Indexed as

Aberrant Crypt FociAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAtorvastatinColorectal NeoplasmsDietary FiberFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolesSulindacSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsAtorvastatinDietary FiberHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrrolesSulindac

Identifiers

PMID21209397
PMCPMC3046804
OpenAlexW2121251645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.