ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2011
Pharmacokinetic analysis of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator disposition in adult sheep using a target-mediated, physiologic recirculation model and a tracer interaction methodology.
Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local depletion of large molecule drugs due to target binding in tissue interstitial space.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Review
- Lessons learned in application driven imaging agent design for image-guided surgery.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Concept of Pharmacologic Target-Mediated Drug Disposition in Large-Molecule and Small-Molecule Compounds.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Review
- Differential pharmacokinetic analysis of in vivo erythropoietin receptor interaction with erythropoietin and continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in sheep.Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA), a PEGylated erythropoietin (EPO) derivative, was studied in sheep after bone marrow (BM) busulfan ablation by using a receptor-based recirculation model and tracer interaction method (TIM) experiments. The nontracer CERA component of the TIM was analyzed using a noncompartmental approach. In contrast to EPO elimination that is linear after the BM ablation, CERA elimination remains nonlinear. After busulfan treatment, initial EPO receptors (EPOR) normalized production rate constant, EPOR degradation rate constant, and CERA-EPOR complex internalization rate constant decreased (p < 0.01), whereas no change in CERA/EPOR equilibrium dissociation constant was detected (p > 0.05). After BM ablation, noncompartmental analysis showed that CERA-PK parameters underwent 1) a decrease in plasma clearance (p < 0.01); 2) a concomitant increase in elimination half-life and mean residence time; and 3) no significant change in volume of distribution, distribution half-life, or distributional clearance (p > 0.05). These results suggest that CERA elimination is mediated through saturable hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic EPOR pathways, with possible contribution of another EPOR-independent pathway(s). Compared with the nonhematopoietic EPOR population, the hematopoietic receptors have similar affinity to CERA but are significantly more involved in CERA's in vivo elimination. The saturable nature of the nonerythropoietic, non-BM pathway(s) for CERA in contrast to EPO predicts two fundamental differences: 1) an increasing fraction of CERA is used for erythropoiesis for increasing concentrations; and 2) the clearance of CERA becomes more limited for increasing concentrations. Taken together, these differences favor a more efficacious and prolonged action for CERA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.