Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21209164›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production in non-Klebsiella pneumoniae Enterobacteriaceae isolates by use of the Phoenix, Vitek 2, and disk diffusion methods.

Christopher D Doern, W Michael Dunne, Carey-Ann D Burnham

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Carbapenemase ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Simple DNAzyme-Based Fluorescent Assay for Klebsiella pneumoniae.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2019
    Article
  6. Carbapenem-ResistantInternational journal of general medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Children.Current infectious disease reports · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of phenotypic detection methods for metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher D DoernDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA. christopher.doern@childrens.com
W Michael Dunne
Carey-Ann D Burnham
Washington University in St. Louis · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we tested the abilities of the Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, and Kirby Bauer disk diffusion tests to detect carbapenemase production in a collection of 14 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing non-Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. In addition, we evaluated 13 KPC-positive K. pneumoniae isolates by using each of these methods and applied both 2009 and 2010 CLSI carbapenem interpretive guidelines.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamsEnterobacteriaceaeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-Lactamscarbapenemase

Identifiers

PMID21209164
PMCPMC3067756
OpenAlexW1979488896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.