Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21209059›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011

How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed.

Brian Deer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Past and Present Vaccinations in Sweden.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Global challenges and solutions to achieving and sustaining measles and rubella elimination.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  9. A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reducing Health Misinformation in Science: A Call to Arms.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Vaccines and autism: a preliminary qualitative study on the beliefs of concerned mothers in Italy.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Article
  20. Neuroethics for Fantasyland or for the Clinic? The Limitations of Speculative Ethics.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brian Deerbriandeer.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Scientific MisconductAutistic DisorderChildConflict of InterestData CollectionHumansJurisprudenceMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID21209059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.