Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21208844›Full record

ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2010

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin, infusional 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) with erlotinib and bevacizumab in colorectal cancer.

Wells A Messersmith, Antonio Jimeno, Heather Jacene, Ming Zhao, Piotr Kulesza, Daniel A Laheru, Yasmin Kahn, Alexander Spira, Janet Dancey, Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wells A MessersmithUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. wells.messersmith@ucdenver.edu
Antonio Jimeno
Heather Jacene
Ming Zhao
Piotr Kulesza
Daniel A Laheru
Yasmin Kahn
Alexander Spira
Janet Dancey
Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue
Ross C Donehower
Michael Carducci
Michelle A Rudek
Manuel Hidalgo
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USNorthwestern University · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

PHASE I TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA070095 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CARDUCCI, MICHAEL A · 1995 to 2013
$8.6M
Evaluation of Oral EGFR Inhibitors in Colorectal CancerK23CA115500 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MESSERSMITH, WELLS A. · 2005 to 2009
$693k
PLANNING A PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN PROSTATE CANCERR21CA069773 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER, PHILIP JOHN · 1995 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS 523CA115500NCI NIH HHS K23 CA115500NCI NIH HHS P30CA069773NCI NIH HHS U01 CA070095NCI NIH HHS U01 CA70095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThis phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Bevacizumab was later included as standard of care at the MTD. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients received FOLFOX4 with escalating doses of erlotinib: dose level (DL) 1, 50 mg; DL 2, 100 mg; and DL 3, 150 mg once daily continuously. Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 1 and 15 was added at the MTD upon Food and Drug Administration approval. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics was assessed in paired skin biopsies, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans.

resultsFifteen patients received 60 cycles (120 FOLFOX treatments). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were seen at DL 3: intolerable grade 2 rash (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 2) lasting > 1 week, and grade 4 neutropenia. Dose level 2 was expanded to 6 more patients, this time adding bevacizumab, and 1 DLT of grade 3 mucositis occurred. As expected, the primary toxicities were cytopenias, diarrhea, rash, and fatigue. There were 2 occurrences of pneumatosis. One patient experienced an unrelated grade 4 myocardial infarction before starting chemotherapy. No pharmacokinetic drug interactions were observed. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response rate was 11 of 14 (78%), median progression-free survival was 9.5 months, and median overall survival was 30 months. Three patients are currently alive > 3 years, with 1 having no evidence of disease.

conclusionThe MTD of erlotinib with FOLFOX4 with or without bevacizumab is 100 mg daily. The regimen appeared to increase toxicity but showed activity in patients with CRC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabColorectal NeoplasmsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleFluorouracilHumansInfusions, IntravenousLeucovorinLiver NeoplasmsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabErlotinib HydrochlorideFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID21208844
PMCPMC3033228
OpenAlexW2141100300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.