Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21208457›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2011

The genome sequence of E. coli W (ATCC 9637): comparative genome analysis and an improved genome-scale reconstruction of E. coli.

Colin T Archer, Jihyun F Kim, Haeyoung Jeong, Jin Hwan Park, Claudia E Vickers, Sang Yup Lee, Lars K Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experimental evolution ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Toxin-based screening of C-terminal tags inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Safety of 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) produced by a derivative strain (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of VariousJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Colin T ArcherAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, Cnr Cooper and College Rds, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Jihyun F Kim
Haeyoung Jeong
Jin Hwan Park
Claudia E Vickers
Sang Yup Lee
Lars K Nielsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscherichia coli is a model prokaryote, an important pathogen, and a key organism for industrial biotechnology. E. coli W (ATCC 9637), one of four strains designated as safe for laboratory purposes, has not been sequenced. E. coli W is a fast-growing strain and is the only safe strain that can utilize sucrose as a carbon source. Lifecycle analysis has demonstrated that sucrose from sugarcane is a preferred carbon source for industrial bioprocesses.

resultsWe have sequenced and annotated the genome of E. coli W. The chromosome is 4,900,968 bp and encodes 4,764 ORFs. Two plasmids, pRK1 (102,536 bp) and pRK2 (5,360 bp), are also present. W has unique features relative to other sequenced laboratory strains (K-12, B and Crooks): it has a larger genome and belongs to phylogroup B1 rather than A. W also grows on a much broader range of carbon sources than does K-12. A genome-scale reconstruction was developed and validated in order to interrogate metabolic properties.

conclusionsThe genome of W is more similar to commensal and pathogenic B1 strains than phylogroup A strains, and therefore has greater utility for comparative analyses with these strains. W should therefore be the strain of choice, or 'type strain' for group B1 comparative analyses. The genome annotation and tools created here are expected to allow further utilization and development of E. coli W as an industrial organism for sucrose-based bioprocesses. Refinements in our E. coli metabolic reconstruction allow it to more accurately define E. coli metabolism relative to previous models.

Indexed as

GenomicsEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID21208457
PMCPMC3032704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.