Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21208450›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Logical development of the cell ontology.

Terrence F Meehan, Anna Maria Masci, Amina Abdulla, Lindsay G Cowell, Judith A Blake, Christopher J Mungall, Alexander D Diehl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Multimodal Spatial and Epigenomic Atlas of Human Adult Lung Topography.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Terrence F MeehanMouse Genome Informatics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA. tmeehan@informatics.jax.org
Anna Maria Masci
Amina Abdulla
Lindsay G Cowell
Judith A Blake
Christopher J Mungall
Alexander D Diehl
Jackson Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

Immune System Biological Networks:Case Study Improved Data Integration & AnalysisR01AI077706 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI COWELL, LINDSAY G. · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS HG002273-09ZNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cell Ontology (CL) is an ontology for the representation of in vivo cell types. As biological ontologies such as the CL grow in complexity, they become increasingly difficult to use and maintain. By making the information in the ontology computable, we can use automated reasoners to detect errors and assist with classification. Here we report on the generation of computable definitions for the hematopoietic cell types in the CL.

resultsComputable definitions for over 340 CL classes have been created using a genus-differentia approach. These define cell types according to multiple axes of classification such as the protein complexes found on the surface of a cell type, the biological processes participated in by a cell type, or the phenotypic characteristics associated with a cell type. We employed automated reasoners to verify the ontology and to reveal mistakes in manual curation. The implementation of this process exposed areas in the ontology where new cell type classes were needed to accommodate species-specific expression of cellular markers. Our use of reasoners also inferred new relationships within the CL, and between the CL and the contributing ontologies. This restructured ontology can be used to identify immune cells by flow cytometry, supports sophisticated biological queries involving cells, and helps generate new hypotheses about cell function based on similarities to other cell types.

conclusionUse of computable definitions enhances the development of the CL and supports the interoperability of OBO ontologies.

Indexed as

Blood CellsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID21208450
PMCPMC3024222
OpenAlexW2044257395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.