ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2010
The use of drip flow and rotating disk reactors for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm analysis.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular membrane vesicles-previously unrecognized components ofJournal of bacteriology · 2026Article
- Assessing non-porous antimicrobial surfaces against bacteria, phages and fungi: a comparative study under varied normative conditions using glass as a benchmark for microbial persistence.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Classical and Modern Models for Biofilm Studies: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biofilm formation ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- An overview of various methods for in vitro biofilm formation: a review.Food science and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- Understanding the effects of aerodynamic and hydrodynamic shear forces on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Involvement of Chromosomally Encoded Homologs of the RRNPP Protein Family in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Formation and Urinary Tract Infection Pathogenesis.Journal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Biofilm-Forming by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae May Contribute to the Blood Stream Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Methods Used for the Eradication of Staphylococcal Biofilms.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Testing Anti-Biofilm Polymeric Surfaces: Where to Start?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Live Cell Analysis of Shear Stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using an Automated Higher-Throughput Microfluidic System.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019Article
- Modelling vaporised hydrogen peroxide efficacy against mono-species biofilms.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018Review
- Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.Research & reviews. Journal of engineering and technology · 2017Article
- The innate immune protein calprotectin promotes Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus interaction.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Emerging interactions between matrix components during biofilm development.Current genetics · 2016Review
- Extracellular DNA facilitates the formation of functional amyloids in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.Molecular microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most microbes in nature are thought to exist as surface-associated communities in biofilms.(1) Bacterial biofilms are encased within a matrix and attached to a surface.(2) Biofilm formation and development are commonly studied in the laboratory using batch systems such as microtiter plates or flow systems, such as flow-cells. These methodologies are useful for screening mutant and chemical libraries (microtiter plates)(3) or growing biofilms for visualization (flow cells)(4). Here we present detailed protocols for growing Staphylococcus aureus in two additional types of flow system biofilms: the drip flow biofilm reactor and the rotating disk biofilm reactor. Drip flow biofilm reactors are designed for the study of biofilms grown under low shear conditions.(5) The drip flow reactor consists of four parallel test channels, each capable of holding one standard glass microscope slide sized coupon, or a length of catheter or stint. The drip flow reactor is ideal for microsensor monitoring, general biofilm studies, biofilm cryosectioning samples, high biomass production, medical material evaluations, and indwelling medical device testing.(6,7,8,9) The rotating disk reactor consists of a teflon disk containing recesses for removable coupons.(10) The removable coupons can by made from any machinable material. The bottom of the rotating disk contains a bar magnet to allow disk rotation to create liquid surface shear across surface-flush coupons. The entire disk containing 18 coupons is placed in a 1000 mL glass side-arm reactor vessel. A liquid growth media is circulated through the vessel while the disk is rotated by a magnetic stirrer. The coupons are removed from the reactor vessel and then scraped to collect the biofilm sample for further study or microscopy imaging. Rotating disc reactors are designed for laboratory evaluations of biocide efficacy, biofilm removal, and performance of anti-fouling materials.(9,11,12,13).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.