Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21206478›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2010

The use of drip flow and rotating disk reactors for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm analysis.

Kelly Schwartz, Rachel Stephenson, Margarita Hernandez, Nicolays Jambang, Blaise R Boles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biofilm formation ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Heliyon · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineering in life sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Methods Used for the Eradication of Staphylococcal Biofilms.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  13. Testing Anti-Biofilm Polymeric Surfaces: Where to Start?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.Research & reviews. Journal of engineering and technology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly SchwartzMolecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, USA.
Rachel Stephenson
Margarita Hernandez
Nicolays Jambang
Blaise R Boles
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Characterization of an extracellular structure produced by Staphylococcus aureusR01AI099065 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOLES, BLAISE R · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
Examination of Staphylococcus aureus interactions with hemoglobinK22AI081748 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOLES, BLAISE R · 2010 to 2011
$268k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI081748NIAID NIH HHS K22AI081748NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most microbes in nature are thought to exist as surface-associated communities in biofilms.(1) Bacterial biofilms are encased within a matrix and attached to a surface.(2) Biofilm formation and development are commonly studied in the laboratory using batch systems such as microtiter plates or flow systems, such as flow-cells. These methodologies are useful for screening mutant and chemical libraries (microtiter plates)(3) or growing biofilms for visualization (flow cells)(4). Here we present detailed protocols for growing Staphylococcus aureus in two additional types of flow system biofilms: the drip flow biofilm reactor and the rotating disk biofilm reactor. Drip flow biofilm reactors are designed for the study of biofilms grown under low shear conditions.(5) The drip flow reactor consists of four parallel test channels, each capable of holding one standard glass microscope slide sized coupon, or a length of catheter or stint. The drip flow reactor is ideal for microsensor monitoring, general biofilm studies, biofilm cryosectioning samples, high biomass production, medical material evaluations, and indwelling medical device testing.(6,7,8,9) The rotating disk reactor consists of a teflon disk containing recesses for removable coupons.(10) The removable coupons can by made from any machinable material. The bottom of the rotating disk contains a bar magnet to allow disk rotation to create liquid surface shear across surface-flush coupons. The entire disk containing 18 coupons is placed in a 1000 mL glass side-arm reactor vessel. A liquid growth media is circulated through the vessel while the disk is rotated by a magnetic stirrer. The coupons are removed from the reactor vessel and then scraped to collect the biofilm sample for further study or microscopy imaging. Rotating disc reactors are designed for laboratory evaluations of biocide efficacy, biofilm removal, and performance of anti-fouling materials.(9,11,12,13).

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsBioreactorsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID21206478
PMCPMC3329798
OpenAlexW2134017075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.