Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21205859›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor protocols2011

NanoCAGE: a high-resolution technique to discover and interrogate cell transcriptomes.

Md Salimullah, Mizuho Sakai, Sakai Mizuho, Charles Plessy, Piero Carninci

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E elevates steady-state mProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Mizuho, Sakai [corrected to Sakai, Mizuho]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md SalimullahRIKEN Yokohama Institute, Omics Science Center, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Mizuho Sakai
Sakai Mizuho
Charles Plessy
Piero Carninci

Funding

Comprehensive Characterization and Classification of the Human TranscriptomeU54HG004557 · NHGRI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GINGERAS, THOMAS RAYMOND · 2007 to 2011
$14.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cap analysis gene expression (CAGE) is a method to identify the 5' ends of transcripts, allowing the discovery of new promoters and the quantification of gene activity. Combining promoter location and their expression levels, CAGE data are essential for annotation-agnostic studies of regulatory gene networks. However, CAGE requires large amounts of input RNA, which usually are not obtainable from highly refined samples such as tissue microdissections or subcellular fractions. The nanoCAGE method can capture the 5' ends of transcripts from as little as 10 ng of total RNA and takes advantage of the capacity of current sequencers to produce longer (50-100 bp) reads. The method prepares cap-selected cDNAs ready for direct sequencing of their 5' ends (optionally mate-paired with the 3' end) that can provide information about downstream sequences. This protocol describes how to prepare nanoCAGE libraries from as little as 50 ng of total RNA within two working days. The libraries can be sequenced using an Illumina sequencer Genome Analyzer IIX [corrected] with a level of sensitivity 1000 times higher than CAGE.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID21205859
PMCPMC4181851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.