Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21204006›Full record

ReviewProtein & cell2010

The next-generation sequencing technology and application.

Xiaoguang Zhou, Lufeng Ren, Qingshu Meng, Yuntao Li, Yude Yu, Jun Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein & cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Exogenous Trehalose AssistsJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. High Glucose Is a Stimulation Signal of the Salt-Tolerant YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Full-Length Transcriptome of the Great Himalayan Leaf-Nosed Bats (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. InnovativeFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. De Novo Paternal FBN1 Mutation Detected in Embryos Before Implantation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  16. Adaptation of acaricide stress facilitatesEcology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rational Protein Engineering Guided by Deep Mutational Scanning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoguang ZhouKey Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China. joezhou@big.ac.cn
Lufeng Ren
Qingshu Meng
Yuntao Li
Yude Yu
Jun Yu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the key technologies in biomedical research, DNA sequencing has not only improved its productivity with an exponential growth rate but also been applied to new areas of application over the past few years. This is largely due to the advent of newer generations of sequencing platforms, offering ever-faster and cheaper ways to analyze sequences. In our previous review, we looked into technical characteristics of the next-generation sequencers and provided prospective insights into their future development. In this article, we present a brief overview of the advantages and shortcomings of key commercially available platforms with a focus on their suitability for a broad range of applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsEpigenomicsGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNanostructuresRNA, Small UntranslatedDNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Small Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID21204006
PMCPMC4875313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.