Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21203813›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2011

HIV risk profiles among HIV-positive, methamphetamine-using men who have sex with both men and women.

Nadine Nakamura, Shirley J Semple, Steffanie A Strathdee, Thomas L Patterson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadine NakamuraFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shirley J Semple
Steffanie A Strathdee
Thomas L Patterson

Funding

Behavior Change and Maintenance Intervention for HIV+ MSM Methamphetamine UsersR01DA021115 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PATTERSON, THOMAS L. · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
PROMOTING SAFER SEX IN HIV+ MSM METHAMPHETAMINE USERSR01DA012116 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI PATTERSON, THOMAS L. · 2000 to 2004
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS DA021115-01NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012116NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012116-01A2NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021115NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA021115-02S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined demographic characteristics, sexual risk behaviors, sexual beliefs, and substance use patterns in HIV-positive, methamphetamine-using men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW) (n = 50) as compared to men who have sex with men only (MSM) (n = 150). Separate logistic regressions were conducted to predict group membership. In the final model, of 12 variables, eight were independently associated with group membership. Factors independently associated with MSMW were acquiring HIV through injection drug use, being an injection drug user, using hallucinogens, using crack, being less likely to have sex at a bathhouse, being less likely to be the receptive partner when high on methamphetamine, having greater intentions to use condoms for oral sex, and having more negative attitudes about HIV disclosure. These results suggest that, among HIV-positive methamphetamine users, MSMW differ significantly from MSM in terms of their HIV risk behaviors. Studies of gay men and HIV often also include bisexual men, grouping them all together as MSM, which may obscure important differences between MSMW and MSM. It is important that future studies consider MSM and MSMW separately in order to expand our knowledge about differential HIV prevention needs for both groups. This study showed that there were important differences in primary and secondary prevention needs of MSM and MSMW. These findings have implications for both primary and secondary HIV prevention among these high-risk populations.

Indexed as

HIV SeropositivityRiskRisk-TakingAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBisexualityFemaleHumansMaleMethamphetamineUnsafe SexMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID21203813
PMCPMC3114110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.