Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21203797›Full record

Trial reportMagma (New York, N.Y.)2011

A Bayesian hierarchical model for DCE-MRI to evaluate treatment response in a phase II study in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Brandon Whitcher, Volker J Schmid, David J Collins, Matthew R Orton, Dow-Mu Koh, Isabela Diaz de Corcuera, Marta Parera, Josep M del Campo, Nandita M DeSouza, Martin O Leach and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Brandon WhitcherGlaxoSmithKline Clinical Imaging Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London W120HS, UK. brandon.j.whitcher@gsk.com
Volker J Schmid
David J Collins
Matthew R Orton
Dow-Mu Koh
Isabela Diaz de Corcuera
Marta Parera
Josep M del Campo
Nandita M DeSouza
Martin O Leach
Kevin Harrington
Iman A El-Hariry
Institute of Cancer Research · GBHebron University · PSGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBImperial College London · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10588Department of Health A10334Medical Research Council C1060Medical Research Council G0701533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectPharmacokinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were used to assess the perfusion effects due to treatment response using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM) is proposed, as an alternative to voxel-wise estimation procedures, to test for a treatment effect while explicitly modeling known sources of variability. MATERIALS AND

methodsNine subjects from a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II study of lapatinib were examined before and after treatment. Kinetic parameters were estimated, with an extended compartmental model and subject-specific arterial input function, on a voxel-by-voxel basis.

resultsThe group treated with lapatinib had a decrease in median K(trans) of 0.17 min⁻¹, when averaged across all voxels in the tumor ROIs, compared with no change in the placebo group based on nonlinear regression. A hypothesis test of equality between pre- and posttreatment K (trans) could not be rejected against a one-sided alternative (P = 0.09). Equality between median K(trans) in placebo and lapatinib groups posttreatment could also not be rejected using the BHM (P = 0.32). Across all scans acquired in the study, estimates of K(trans) at one site were greater on average than those at the other site by including a site effect in the BHM. The inter-voxel variability is of similar order (within 15%) when compared to the inter-patient variability.

conclusionThough the study contained a small number of subjects and no significant difference was found, the Bayesian hierarchical model provided estimates of variability from known sources in the study and confidence intervals for all estimated parameters. We believe the BHM provides a straightforward and thorough interrogation of the imaging data at the level of voxels, patients or sites in this multicenter clinical study.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBayes TheoremBiomarkersCarcinoma, Squamous CellContrast MediaEndpoint DeterminationHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLapatinibMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersContrast MediaLapatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID21203797
OpenAlexW2031430426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.