Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21203509›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

The bacterial intimins and invasins: a large and novel family of secreted proteins.

Jennifer C Tsai, Ming-Ren Yen, Rostislav Castillo, Denisse L Leyton, Ian R Henderson, Milton H Saier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SeaB is a conservedInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The long and the short of Periscope Proteins.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer C TsaiDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Ming-Ren Yen
Rostislav Castillo
Denisse L Leyton
Ian R Henderson
Milton H Saier
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

The Transporter Classification Database (TCDB)R01GM077402 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SAIER, MILTON H. · 2006 to 2021
$4.7M
Medical Research Council G0801209NIGMS NIH HHS GM077402NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGram-negative bacteria have developed a limited repertoire of solutions for secreting proteins from the cytoplasmic compartment to the exterior of the cell. Amongst the spectrum of secreted proteins are the intimins and invasins (the Int/Inv family; TC# 1.B.54) which are characterized by an N-terminal β-barrel domain and a C-terminal surface localized passenger domain. Despite the important role played by members of this family in diseases mediated by several species of the Enterobacteriaceae, there has been little appreciation for the distribution and diversity of these proteins amongst Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, there is little understanding of the molecular events governing secretion of these proteins to the extracellular milieu. PRINCIPAL

findingsIn silico approaches were used to analyze the domain organization and diversity of members of this secretion family. Proteins belonging to this family are predominantly associated with organisms from the γ-proteobacteria. Whilst proteins from the Chlamydia, γ-, β- and ε-proteobacteria possess β-barrel domains and passenger domains of various sizes, Int/Inv proteins from the α-proteobacteria, cyanobacteria and chlorobi possess only the predicted β-barrel domains. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that with few exceptions these proteins cluster according to organismal type, indicating that divergence occurred contemporaneously with speciation, and that horizontal transfer was limited. Clustering patterns of the β-barrel domains correlate well with those of the full-length proteins although the passenger domains do so with much less consistency. The modular subdomain design of the passenger domains suggests that subdomain duplication and deletion have occurred with high frequency over evolutionary time. However, all repeated subdomains are found in tandem, suggesting that subdomain shuffling occurred rarely if at all. Topological predictions for the β-barrel domains are presented.

conclusionBased on our in silico analyses we present a model for the biogenesis of these proteins. This study is the first of its kind to describe this unusual family of bacterial adhesins.

Indexed as

Adhesins, BacterialAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceBacteriaBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyEnterobacteriaceaeGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyProtein ConformationProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryAdhesins, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21203509
PMCPMC3008723
OpenAlexW2044754191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.