Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21200422›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2010

Granulomatous reactivation during the course of a leprosy infection: reaction or relapse.

Maria Angela Bianconcini Trindade, Gil Benard, Somei Ura, Cássio Cesar Ghidella, João Carlos Regazzi Avelleira, Francisco Reis Vianna, Alfredo Bolchat Marques, Ben Naafs, Raul Negrão Fleury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Leprosy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria Angela Bianconcini TrindadeHealth Institute, São Paulo State Health Department, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. angelatrindade@uol.com.br
Gil Benard
Somei Ura
Cássio Cesar Ghidella
João Carlos Regazzi Avelleira
Francisco Reis Vianna
Alfredo Bolchat Marques
Ben Naafs
Raul Negrão Fleury
Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima · BRLeiden University Medical Center · NLOklahoma State Department of Health · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy is a chronic granulomatous infectious disease and is still endemic in many parts of the world. It causes disabilities which are the consequence of nerve damage. This damage is in most cases the result of immunological reactions.

objectivesTo investigate the differences between a type 1 leprosy (reversal) reaction and relapse on using histopathology.

methodsThe histopathological changes in 167 biopsies from 66 leprosy patients were studied. The patients were selected when their sequential biopsies demonstrated either different patterns or maintained the same pattern of granulomatous reaction over more than two years during or after the treatment of leprosy.

resultsIn 57 of the patients studied, a reactivation was seen which coincided with a decrease in the bacteriological index (BI), suggesting that this reactivation (reversal reaction or type 1 leprosy reaction) coincides with an effective capacity for bacteriological clearance. In nine patients, an increase of the bacteriologic index (IB) or persistence of solid bacilli occurred during the reactivation, indicating proliferative activity, suggestive of a relapse. The histopathological aspects of the granulomas were similar in both groups.

conclusionBacterioscopy provided the only means to differentiate a reversal reaction from a relapse in patients with granulomatous reactivation. The type 1 leprosy reaction may be considered as a part effective immune reconstitution (reversal, upgrading reaction) or as a mere hypersensitivity reaction (downgrading reaction) in a relapse.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleGranulomaHistocytochemistryHumansImmune Reconstitution Inflammatory SyndromeLeprosyMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedMycobacterium lepraeRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID21200422
PMCPMC3006134
OpenAlexW2086650105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.