Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21200340›Full record

Trial reportMedicine and science in sports and exercise2011

Interhemispheric plasticity in humans.

Tibor Hortobágyi, Sarah Pirio Richardson, Mikhael Lomarev, Ejaz Shamim, Sabine Meunier, Heike Russman, Nguyet Dang, Mark Hallett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Tibor HortobágyiDepartment of Exercise and Sport Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA. hortobagyit@ecu.edu
Sarah Pirio Richardson
Mikhael Lomarev
Ejaz Shamim
Sabine Meunier
Heike Russman
Nguyet Dang
Mark Hallett
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USEast Carolina University · USInserm · FRNational Institutes of Health · USSt.Petersburg V.M.Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute · RUUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Physiology of Voluntary MovementZIANS002669 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLETT, MARK · 2009 to 2023
$15.4M
Interhemispheric plasticity in humansF33NS049783 · NINDS · U.S. NATIONAL INST/NEURO/DS/STROKE · PI HORTOBAGYI, TIBOR · 2005 to 2005
$56k
International Symposium on Motor Control Using TMSR13NS047105 · NINDS · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI HORTOBAGYI, TIBOR · 2004 to 2004
$9k
NINDS NIH HHS F33 NS049783NINDS NIH HHS NS049783NINDS NIH HHS R13 NS047105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic unimanual motor practice increases the motor output not only in the trained but also in the nonexercised homologous muscle in the opposite limb. We examined the hypothesis that adaptations in motor cortical excitability of the nontrained primary motor cortex (iM1) and in interhemispheric inhibition from the trained to the nontrained M1 mediate this interlimb cross education.

methodsHealthy, young volunteers (n=12) performed 1000 submaximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of the right first dorsal interosseus (FDI) at 80% MVC during 20 sessions.

resultsTrained FDI's MVC increased 49.9%, and the untrained FDI's MVC increased 28.1%. Although corticospinal excitability in iM1, measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after every fifth session, increased 6% at rest, these changes, as those in intracortical inhibition and facilitation, did not correlate with cross education. When weak and strong TMS of iM1 were delivered on a background of a weak and strong muscle contraction, respectively, of the right FDI, excitability of iM1 increased dramatically after 20 sessions. Interhemispheric inhibition decreased 8.9% acutely within sessions and 30.9% chronically during 20 sessions and these chronic reductions progressively became more strongly associated with cross education. There were no changes in force or TMS measures in the trained group's left abductor minimi digiti and there were no changes in the nonexercising control group (n=8).

conclusionsThe findings provide the first evidence for plasticity of interhemispheric connections to mediate cross education produced by a simple motor task.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultCerebrumEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleFunctional LateralityHandHumansMaleMotor ActivityMotor CortexMuscle ContractionNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID21200340
PMCPMC4137570
OpenAlexW2071176667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.