Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21200143›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2011

Reviewing once more the c-myc and Ras collaboration: converging at the cyclin D1-CDK4 complex and challenging basic concepts of cancer biology.

Chenguang Wang, Michael P Lisanti, D Joshua Liao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Unraveling MYC's Role in Orchestrating Tumor Intrinsic and Tumor Microenvironment Interactions Driving Tumorigenesis and Drug Resistance.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  4. AIM2 sensors mediate immunity toProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anti-Biomedicines · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CDKs in Sarcoma: Mediators of Disease and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Pathway-guided analysis identifies Myc-dependent alternative pre-mRNA splicing in aggressive prostate cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. MYC leads the way.Small GTPases · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chenguang WangDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, and Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael P Lisanti
D Joshua Liao
Thomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

c-Myc, growth factor and breast cancerR01CA100864 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LIAO, DEZHONG JOSHUA · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100864NCI NIH HHS R01CA100864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The c-myc is a proto-oncogene that manifests aberrant expression at high frequencies in most types of human cancer. C-myc gene amplifications are often observed in various cancers as well. Ample studies have also proved that c-myc has a potent oncogenicity, which can be further enhanced by collaborations with other oncogenes such as Bcl-2 and activated Ras. Studies on the collaborations of c-myc with Ras or other genes in oncogenicity have established several basic concepts and have disclosed their underlying mechanisms of tumor biology, including "immortalization" and "transformation". In many cases, these collaborations may converge at the cyclin D1-CDK4 complex. In the meantime, however, many results from studies on the c-myc, Ras and cyclin D1-CDK4 also challenge these basic concepts of tumor biology and suggest to us that the immortalized status of cells should be emphasized. Stricter criteria and definitions for a malignantly transformed status and a benign status of cells in culture also need to be established to facilitate our study of the mechanisms for tumor formation and to better link up in vitro data with animal results and eventually with human cancer pathology.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TransformedCyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4HumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycras ProteinsCyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4MAS1 protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene MasProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21200143
PMCPMC3048075
OpenAlexW1963837044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.