Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21198547›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2011

Muscarinic receptor antagonists, from folklore to pharmacology; finding drugs that actually work in asthma and COPD.

Bart C Moulton, Allison D Fryer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. [Anisocoria in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bart C MoultonDivision Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, 97239, USA. moulton@ohsu.edu
Allison D Fryer
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Training in Pulmonary MedicineT32HL083808 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LEWINSOHN, DAVID M., SLATORE, CHRISTOPHER G. · 2008 to 2025
$5.3M
Ozone inhibition of Neuronal m2 receptor functionR01HL055543 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRYER, ALLISON DEBORAH · 1996 to 2008
$2.6M
Role of macrophages in organophosphorus pesticide-induced airway hyperreactivityR01ES017592 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FRYER, ALLISON DEBORAH, LEIN, PAMELA J · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Asthma Exacerbation by Organophosphate PesticidesR01ES014601 · NIEHS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRYER, ALLISON DEBORAH · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL55543NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL083808NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014601NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the lungs, parasympathetic nerves provide the dominant control of airway smooth muscle with release of acetylcholine onto M3 muscarinic receptors. Treatment of airway disease with anticholinergic drugs that block muscarinic receptors began over 2000 years ago. Pharmacologic data all indicated that antimuscarinic drugs should be highly effective in asthma but clinical results were mixed. Thus, with the discovery of effective β-adrenergic receptor agonists the use of muscarinic antagonists declined. Lack of effectiveness of muscarinic antagonists is due to a variety of factors including unwanted side effects (ranging from dry mouth to coma) and the discovery of additional muscarinic receptor subtypes in the lungs with sometimes competing effects. Perhaps the most important problem is ineffective dosing due to poorly understood differences between routes of administration and no effective way of testing whether antagonists block receptors stimulated physiologically by acetylcholine. Newer muscarinic receptor antagonists are being developed that address the problems of side effects and receptor selectivity that appear to be quite promising in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsthmaDrug DiscoveryHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveMuscarinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID21198547
PMCPMC3085867
OpenAlexW1793910073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.