Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21198432›Full record

SynthesisCurrent HIV research2011

Long-term safety from the raltegravir clinical development program.

Hedy Teppler, Deborah D Brown, Randi Y Leavitt, Peter Sklar, Hong Wan, Xia Xu, Fabio Lievano, Heidi P Lehman, T Christopher Mast, Bach-Yen T Nguyen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current HIV research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00369941 (A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiretroviral Activity of MK-0518 Versus Efavirenz in Treatment Naive HIV-Infected Patients, Each in Combination With TRUVADA™), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00369941 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiretroviral Activity of MK-0518 Versus Efavirenz in Treatment Naive HIV-Infected Patients, Each in Combination With TRUVADA™

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2006 to 2012Enrolled566ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsMK-0518, Comparator: efavirenz, Comparator: Truvada, Comparator: Placebo to MK-0518, Comparator: Placebo to efavirenz
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Integrase Inhibitors are Associated with Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Women with HIV.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Beneficial and Adverse Effects of cART Affect Neurocognitive Function in HIV-1 Infection: Balancing Viral Suppression against Neuronal Stress and Injury.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychiatric Symptoms in Patients Receiving Dolutegravir.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hedy TepplerHedy Teppler, MD, Merck Research Laboratories, PO Box 1000, UG3D-56, North Wales, PA 19454-1099, USA. hedy_teppler@merck.com
Deborah D Brown
Randi Y Leavitt
Peter Sklar
Hong Wan
Xia Xu
Fabio Lievano
Heidi P Lehman
T Christopher Mast
Bach-Yen T Nguyen
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRaltegravir has demonstrated potent and durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in 3 phase III studies in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. This manuscript provides a review of the raltegravir safety profile using data from these and other studies in the clinical development program.

methodsComprehensive 96-week safety data from STARTMRK (raltegravir versus efavirenz, each with tenofovir/emtricitabine) and BENCHMRK (raltegravir versus placebo, each with optimized background therapy) are summarized. A cumulative meta-analysis of raltegravir 400 mg bid was conducted across the entire development program.

resultsIn STARTMRK, drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred less frequently with raltegravir than efavirenz. In BENCHMRK, the most common drug-related AEs occurred at generally similar frequencies in both groups. Drug-related serious AEs were uncommon. Rash was observed in raltegravir-treated patients at a higher frequency than placebo but a lower frequency than efavirenz. Depression and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome occurred at similar rates for raltegravir and comparators. Isolated elevations of creatine kinase were more common with raltegravir than placebo but occurred without clinical manifestations. The frequency of aminotransferase elevations was greater in patients with viral hepatitis co-infection, but similar in the raltegravir and comparator groups. The relative risk (95% CI) of cancer was 0.75 (0.30, 1.91) indicating no difference between raltegravir and comparator. Overall trends in the cumulative meta-analysis were similar to those observed in the phase III studies.

conclusionsLong-term data from the phase III clinical trials demonstrate that raltegravir was generally well-tolerated in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolidinonesRaltegravir PotassiumRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsPyrrolidinonesRaltegravir Potassium

Identifiers

PMID21198432
PMCPMC3267161
OpenAlexW2161780532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.