Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21196526›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Mechanism of chromosomal boundary action: roadblock, sink, or loop?

Daryl Gohl, Tsutomu Aoki, Jason Blanton, Greg Shanower, Gretchen Kappes, Paul Schedl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptional Readthrough Interrupts Boundary Function in Drosophila.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Transcriptional read through interrupts boundary function in Drosophila.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Tau Oligomers Neurotoxicity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Boundaries of loop domains (insulators): Determinants of chromosome form and function in multicellular eukaryotes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daryl GohlDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.
Tsutomu Aoki
Jason Blanton
Greg Shanower
Gretchen Kappes
Paul Schedl

Funding

MOLECULAR AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF CHROMATIN STRUCTURER01GM043432 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEDL, PAUL D · 1990 to 2017
$5.8M
Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Chromatin StructureR56GM043432 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEDL, PAUL D · 2008 to 2008
$389k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-043432NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043432NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM043432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boundary elements or insulators subdivide eukaryotic chromosomes into a series of structurally and functionally autonomous domains. They ensure that the action of enhancers and silencers is restricted to the domain in which these regulatory elements reside. Three models, the roadblock, sink/decoy, and topological loop, have been proposed to explain the insulating activity of boundary elements. Strong predictions about how boundaries will function in different experimental contexts can be drawn from these models. In the studies reported here, we have designed assays that test these predictions. The results of our assays are inconsistent with the expectations of the roadblock and sink models. Instead, they support the topological loop model.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomesDrosophila melanogasterInsulator ElementsPhenotypeRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalSilencer Elements, Transcriptional

Identifiers

PMID21196526
PMCPMC3063668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.