Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21196520›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Analysis of B-genome chromosome introgression in interspecific hybrids of Brassica napus × B. carinata.

Zahra K Navabi, Kiersten E Stead, J Chris Pires, Zhiyong Xiong, Andrew G Sharpe, Isobel A P Parkin, M Habibur Rahman, Allen G Good

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Breeding and management of major resistance genes to stem canker/blackleg in Brassica crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  2. Genome composition in Brassica interspecific hybrids affects chromosome inheritance and viability of progeny.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Introgression of Heterotic Genomic Segments fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. In silico integration of disease resistance QTL, genes and markers with theMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Deployment ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent Findings Unravel Genes and Genetic Factors UnderlyingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative cytogenetics · 2017
    Article
  17. B chromosome inComparative cytogenetics · 2017
    Article
  18. Introgression of Black Rot Resistance fromFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  19. Resynthesis of Brassica napus through hybridization between B. juncea and B. carinata.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016
    Article
  20. Introgressing Subgenome Components fromFrontiers in plant science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra K NavabiAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0X2, Canada.
Kiersten E Stead
J Chris Pires
Zhiyong Xiong
Andrew G Sharpe
Isobel A P Parkin
M Habibur Rahman
Allen G Good

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brassica carinata, an allotetraploid with B and C genomes, has a number of traits that would be valuable to introgress into B. napus. Interspecific hybrids were created between B. carinata (BBCC) and B. napus (AACC), using an advanced backcross approach to identify and introgress traits of agronomic interest from the B. carinata genome and to study the genetic changes that occur during the introgression process. We mapped the B and C genomes of B. carinata with SSR markers and observed their introgression into B. napus through a number of backcross generations, focusing on a BC(3) and BC(3)S(1) sibling family. There was close colinearity between the C genomes of B. carinata and B. napus and we provide evidence that B. carinata C chromosomes pair and recombine normally with those of B. napus, suggesting that similar to other Brassica allotetraploids no major chromosomal rearrangements have taken place since the formation of B. carinata. There was no evidence of introgression of the B chromosomes into the A or C chromosomes of B. napus; instead they were inherited as whole linkage groups with the occasional loss of terminal segments and several of the B-genome chromosomes were retained across generations. Several BC(3)S(1) families were analyzed using SSR markers, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) assays, and chromosome counts to study the inheritance of the B-genome chromosome(s) and their association with morphological traits. Our work provides an analysis of the behavior of chromosomes in an interspecific cross and reinforces the challenges of introgressing novel traits into crop plants.

Indexed as

PolyploidyBrassicaBrassica napusChimeraGenetic LinkageGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMinisatellite Repeats

Identifiers

PMID21196520
PMCPMC3063663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.