Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21196410›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition)2011

RAGE and its ligands in bone metabolism.

Zheng Zhou, Wen-Cheng Xiong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Quantitative imaging of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products in prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. RAGE Signaling in Skeletal Biology.Current osteoporosis reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zheng ZhouInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Wen-Cheng Xiong
Augusta University · US

Funding

ROLE OF PYK2 IN REGULATING OSTEOCLASTIC BONE RESORPTIONR01AR048120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI XIONG, WEN-CHENG · 2002 to 2011
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR048120NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), a member of the immunoglobulin super-family transmembrane proteins, has multiple ligands, thus, is implicated in the pathogenesis of various diseases, including diabetic complications, neurodegenerative disorders, and inflammatory responses. Its function in normal physiology is beginning to be defined, and recent studies have pointed to an important role for RAGE and its ligands (e.g., HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1)) in innate immune response. In addition, RAGE and its ligands are also implicated in osteoclast activation and bone remodeling. Understanding how RAGE and its ligands regulate bone remodeling may provide insight into the pathogenesis of diabetes and chronic inflammation associated bone loss. Recent progress relevant to the functions of RAGE and its ligands in bone remodeling is discussed in this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone RemodelingChondrocytesHMGB1 ProteinHumansImmunity, InnateLigandsMiceOsteoblastsOsteoclastsReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsS100 ProteinsHMGB1 ProteinLigandsReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsS100 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21196410
PMCPMC3815642
OpenAlexW2008630579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.