ReviewUrologic oncology
International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees.
Review in Urologic oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- A low-cost approach to high quality responsible conduct of research education.International journal of ethics education · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with research misconduct among faculty in selected public universities in Eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.Discover education · 2025Article
- Perceptions of the Research Integrity Climate in Egyptian Universities: A Survey Among Academic Researchers.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024Article
- The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- [Scientific integrity faces plagiarism fabricated with the ChatGPT].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
- The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Do biomedical researchers differ in their perceptions of plagiarism across Europe? Findings from an online survey among leading universities.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Taiwanese and American Graduate Students' Misconceptions Regarding Responsible Conduct of Research: A Cross-National Comparison Using a Two-Tier Test Approach.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Faculty perceptions of student plagiarism and interventions to tackle it: a multiphase mixed-methods study in Qatar.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020Article
- Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- What Explains Associations of Researchers' Nation of Origin and Scores on a Measure of Professional Decision-Making? Exploring Key Variables and Interpretation of Scores.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- An Introduction to Cultural Sensitivity and Global Pharmacy Engagement.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Mentorship and Ethics in Global Health: Fostering Scientific Integrity and Responsible Conduct of Research.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019Article
- The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East.Journal of academic ethics · 2018Article
- Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies.Journal of Korean medical science · 2017Review
- Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- The Central Importance of Laboratories for Reducing Waste in Biomedical Research.Science and engineering ethics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the increasingly global community of biomedical science and graduate science education, many US academic researchers work with international trainees whose views on scientific writing and plagiarism can be strikingly different from US norms. Although a growing number of countries and international professional organizations identify plagiarism as research misconduct, many international trainees come from research environments where plagiarism is ill-defined and even commonly practiced. Two research-ethics educators consider current perspectives on plagiarism around the world and contend that US research-training programs should focus on trainees' scientific writing skills and acculturation, not simply on preventing plagiarism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.