Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21193960›Full record

ArticleBiogerontology2011

Evaluation of genotype-specific survival using joint analysis of genetic and non-genetic subsamples of longitudinal data.

Konstantin G Arbeev, Svetlana V Ukraintseva, Liubov S Arbeeva, Igor Akushevich, Alexander M Kulminski, Anatoliy I Yashin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biogerontology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neutral theory for life histories and individual variability in fitness components.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Konstantin G ArbeevCenter for Population Health and Aging, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0408, USA. konstantin.arbeev@duke.edu
Svetlana V Ukraintseva
Liubov S Arbeeva
Igor Akushevich
Alexander M Kulminski
Anatoliy I Yashin
Center for Child and Family Health · USDuke University · US

Funding

EVALUATING NEW GENETIC EFFECTS ON HEALTH AND AGING FROM LONGITUDINAL DATAR01AG030612 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2007 to 2011
$2.9M
DYNAMIC DETERMINANTS OF EXCEPTIONAL HEALTH AT LATE AGESR01AG027019 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
Healthy Life at Risk: The Role of SenescenceR01AG028259 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
THE FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY-N01HC25195-268025195-268025195N01HC025195 · HC · TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY · PI WOLF, PHILIP A · 2002 to 2006
–
NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC025195NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027019NIA NIH HHS R01AG027019NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028259NIA NIH HHS R01AG028259NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030612NIA NIH HHS R01AG030612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small sample size of genetic data is often a limiting factor for desirable accuracy of estimated genetic effects on age-specific risks and survival. Longitudinal non-genetic data containing information on survival or disease onsets of study participants for whom the genetic data were not collected may provide an additional "reserve" for increasing the accuracy of respective estimates. We present a novel method for joint analyses of "genetic" (covering individuals for whom both genetic information and mortality/morbidity data are available) and "non-genetic" (covering individuals for whom only mortality/morbidity data were collected) subsamples of longitudinal data. Our simulation studies show substantial increase in the accuracy of estimates in such joint analyses compared to analyses based on genetic subsample alone. Application of this method to analysis of the effect of common apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism on survival using combined genetic and non-genetic subsamples of the Framingham Heart Study original cohort data showed that female, but not male, carriers of the APOE e4 allele have significantly worse survival than non-carriers, whereas empirical analyses did not produce any significant results for either sex.

Indexed as

GenotypeLongitudinal StudiesSurvivalAllelesApolipoproteins EFemaleHumansLongevityMaleModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, GeneticSample SizeApolipoproteins E

Identifiers

PMID21193960
PMCPMC3352324
OpenAlexW1970068642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.