Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21193944›Full record

ArticleInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2011

Comparison of cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of ischemia pre- and postconditioning in rats with myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Jun Xiong, Qiang Wang, Fu-Shan Xue, Yuan-Jing Yuan, Shan Li, Jian-Hua Liu, Xu Liao, Yan-Ming Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Postconditioning with vagal stimulation attenuates local and systemic inflammatory responses to myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury in rats.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100144, China.
Qiang Wang
Fu-Shan Xue
Yuan-Jing Yuan
Shan Li
Jian-Hua Liu
Xu Liao
Yan-Ming Zhang
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of ischemia preconditioning (IPC) and ischemia postconditioning (IPOC) in a rat myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) model.

methodsForty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided equally into four groups. In the groups other than the sham group, the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated for 30 min followed by a 180 min reperfusion in vivo. The control group was subjected to no additional intervention, the IPC group to three cycles of 5 min ischemia separated by 5 min reperfusion before the index ischemia and the IPOC group to three cycles of 10 s ischemia separated by 10 s reperfusion immediately after the end of the index ischemia. Hemodynamic changes during the ischemia and reperfusion were recorded. At 180 min of reperfusion, serum concentrations of troponin I (TnI), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB-1) were assayed, and the infarction size was assessed by Evans blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining.

resultsCompared to the control group, infarct size and serum concentrations of TnI, TNF-α and HMGB1 at 180 min of reperfusion were significantly reduced in the IPC and IPOC groups. However, infarct size and serum concentrations of TNF-α and HMGB1 at 180 min of reperfusion were significantly increased in the IPOC group compared to the IPC group.

conclusionsIn the rats with myocardial IRI in vivo, both IPC and IPOC can produce significant cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. However, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects provided by IPOC are weaker than with IPC.

Indexed as

Ischemic PostconditioningIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacBlood PressureHeart RateHMGB1 ProteinInflammationMaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTroponin ITumor Necrosis Factor-alphaHbp1 protein, ratHMGB1 ProteinTroponin ITumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID21193944
OpenAlexW1974787119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.