ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011
Comparison of Arcobacter isolation methods, and diversity of Arcobacter spp. in Cheshire, United Kingdom.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular and Genetic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Pathogenicity assessment of Arcobacter butzleri isolated from Canadian agricultural surface water.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Prolonged watery diarrhea and malnutrition caused byLe infezioni in medicina · 2024Article
- The Prevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- NRJ Media as the Gold-StandardFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Characterization of Arcobacter spp. Isolated from human diarrheal, non-diarrheal and food samples in Thailand.PloS one · 2021Article
- The incidence and antimicrobial resistance ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2020Article
- Molecular determination of genetic diversity amongInfection ecology & epidemiology · 2020Article
- Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility ofGut pathogens · 2020Article
- Diversity, enumeration, and isolation of Arcobacter spp. in the giant abalone, Haliotis gigantea.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Article
- First isolation report of Arcobacter cryaerophilus from a human diarrhea sample in Costa Rica.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2017Article
- Comparative Detection and Quantification of Arcobacter butzleri in Stools from Diarrheic and Nondiarrheic People in Southwestern Alberta, Canada.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Development of a comparative genomic fingerprinting assay for rapid and high resolution genotyping of Arcobacter butzleri.BMC microbiology · 2015Article
- Arcobacter butzleri in sheep ricotta cheese at retail and related sources of contamination in an industrial dairy plant.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014Article
- Temporal and farm-management-associated variation in faecal pat prevalence of Arcobacter spp. in ruminants.Epidemiology and infection · 2014Article
- Article
- Exploring the diversity of Arcobacter butzleri from cattle in the UK using MLST and whole genome sequencing.PloS one · 2013Article
- Detection of Campylobacter species and Arcobacter butzleri in stool samples by use of real-time multiplex PCR.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this study were, firstly, to compare five published methods for the isolation of Arcobacter spp. from animal feces in order to determine the most sensitive and specific method. Second, we analyzed the resulting isolates by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) in order to investigate the diversity of the isolates recovered. Third, we investigated the ability to recover Arcobacter spp. from frozen fecal samples. Seventy-seven fecal samples from cattle, sheep, and badgers were subjected to five isolation methods, based on published methods for the isolation of Arcobacter and Campylobacter spp. Thirty-nine Arcobacter butzleri isolates were analyzed using a multilocus sequence typing scheme. The survival of Arcobacter spp. in frozen samples was investigated by freezing the fecal samples at -80°C for 7 days and then applying the same five isolation methods. The most sensitive and specific method used an Arcobacter-specific broth in conjunction with modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) with added antibiotics. Freezing of fecal samples led to a reduction in the recovery of Arcobacter spp. by approximately 50%. The 39 allelic profiles obtained by MLST could be divided into 11 sequence types (STs). We have identified the most sensitive and specific method for the isolation of Arcobacter spp. from animal feces and demonstrated that the freezing of fecal samples prior to isolation reduces arcobacter recovery. MLST analysis of the isolates revealed a high level of diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.