Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21192206›Full record

Trial reportQuality management in health care

Appreciative Inquiry for quality improvement in primary care practices.

Mary C Ruhe, Sarah N Bobiak, David Litaker, Caroline A Carter, Laura Wu, Casey Schroeder, Stephen J Zyzanski, Sharon M Weyer, James J Werner, Ronald E Fry and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality management in health care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Engagement of groups in family medicine board maintenance of certification.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mary C RuheDepartment of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. mary.ruhe@case.edu
Sarah N Bobiak
David Litaker
Caroline A Carter
Laura Wu
Casey Schroeder
Stephen J Zyzanski
Sharon M Weyer
James J Werner
Ronald E Fry
Kurt C Stange

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Amar Desai · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
Practice Outcomes in Community &Healthcare SystemsR01CA060862 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI STANGE, KURT C · 1994 to 2008
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA60862NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS P30-CA043703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA060862NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024989NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test the effect of an Appreciative Inquiry (AI) quality improvement strategy on clinical quality management and practice development outcomes. Appreciative inquiry enables the discovery of shared motivations, envisioning a transformed future, and learning around the implementation of a change process.

methodsThirty diverse primary care practices were randomly assigned to receive an AI-based intervention focused on a practice-chosen topic and on improving preventive service delivery (PSD) rates. Medical-record review assessed change in PSD rates. Ethnographic field notes and observational checklist analysis used editing and immersion/crystallization methods to identify factors affecting intervention implementation and practice development outcomes.

resultsThe PSD rates did not change. Field note analysis suggested that the intervention elicited core motivations, facilitated development of a shared vision, defined change objectives, and fostered respectful interactions. Practices most likely to implement the intervention or develop new practice capacities exhibited 1 or more of the following: support from key leader(s), a sense of urgency for change, a mission focused on serving patients, health care system and practice flexibility, and a history of constructive practice change.

conclusionsAn AI approach and enabling practice conditions can lead to intervention implementation and practice development by connecting individual and practice strengths and motivations to the change objective.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPrimary Health CarePrimary PreventionQuality ImprovementRacial GroupsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID21192206
PMCPMC4222905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.