ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2011
Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Padova Charter on personal injury and damage under civil-tort law : Medico-legal guidelines on methods of ascertainment and criteria of evaluation.International journal of legal medicine · 2016Guideline
- Ethyl glucuronide concentration in hair for detecting heavy drinking and/or abstinence: a meta-analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Malpractice and medical liability. European Guidelines on Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation.International journal of legal medicine · 2013Guideline
- Phosphatidylethanol in blood as a marker of chronic alcohol use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Pooled it
- Pharmacology through the lens of bibliometrics: global trends, research hotspots, and collaborations (2015-2026).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Case Report: A complex congenital bilateral multidirectional glenohumeral hyperlaxity with instability: surgical, anatomical, and forensic insights.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- The transversoclasiotome: a novel instrument for examining the vertebral artery.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Clinical Anatomy and Medical Malpractice-A Narrative Review with Methodological Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Back to the Future - Part 1. The medico-legal autopsy from ancient civilization to the post-genomic era.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Review
- Visualizing Forensic Publication Impacts and Collaborations: Presenting at a Scientific Venue Leads to Increased Collaborations between Researchers and Information Professionals.Science & technology libraries · 2016Article
- Trends in World Dental Research: an overview of the last three decades using the Web of Science.Clinical oral investigations · 2013Review
- Medical malpractice and legal medicine.International journal of legal medicine · 2013Article
- Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe.International journal of legal medicine · 2012Article
- Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe. A country-based analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In times of globalisation, the future of bio-medicolegal sciences in Europe depends on the scientific community's ability to develop new strategies for research, to introduce new and generally accepted standards, to develop new analytical methods, all in order to draw up inter-site, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary long-term research projects, eligible for European Union (EU) funding. To analyse the scientific output and to identify the topics of greatest interest and appeal in these sciences, an innovative method has been developed to select and analyse publications. This method has been applied to analyse a total of 21,176 records from PubMed out of which 5,826 papers were suitable for further analysis because they were published in national and international journals in the time between January 1, 2005 and June 1, 2010 by European authors in the field of interest. In 69% of all manuscripts, authors presented results of systematic research (original articles); 84% of the papers were written in English language. The cumulative impact factor increased from 1,670 points in 2005 to 1,878 in 2009, and extrapolated 2,812 points in 2010. The most frequent topics were the description of new analytical methods in forensic toxicology (5.7% of all papers), the analysis of short tandem repeat systems (STR, 5.6%) as well as the analysis of injury mechanisms in forensic pathology and clinical forensic medicine (4.9%). If the impact factor related potential of different topics is calculated (ratio of frequency of papers and frequency of impact points achieved), SIDS research reaches 1.64 points, followed by studies on mtDNA (1.59) and the development of new analytical methods in forensic toxicology (1.49). The findings made in the present bibliometric analysis reveal a clear and interesting overall picture of the European scientific production and productivity and could be used to identify the most innovative research lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21191611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.