Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21191439›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2010

Emotion causes targeted forgetting of established memories.

Bryan A Strange, Marijn C W Kroes, Judith E Fan, Raymond J Dolan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emotional oddball: A review on memory effects.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Impairing existing declarative memory in humans by disrupting reconsolidation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  16. Does reconsolidation occur in humans?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryan A StrangeWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology London, UK.
Marijn C W Kroes
Judith E Fan
Raymond J Dolan
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconsolidation postulates that reactivation of a memory trace renders it susceptible to disruption by treatments similar to those that impair initial memory consolidation. Despite evidence that implicit, or non-declarative, human memories can be disrupted at retrieval, a convincing demonstration of selective impairment in retrieval of target episodic memories following reactivation is lacking. In human subjects, we demonstrate that if reactivation of a verbal memory, through successful retrieval, is immediately followed by an emotionally aversive stimulus, a significant impairment is evident in its later recall. This effect is time-dependent and persists for at least 6 days. Thus, in line with a reconsolidation hypothesis, established human episodic memories can be selectively impaired following their retrieval.

Indexed as

consolidationcued recallemotionepisodic memoryreconsolidationretrograde amnesia

Identifiers

PMID21191439
PMCPMC3009474
OpenAlexW2061550104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.