SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2010
Genome-wide transcription profiling of human sepsis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Utility of Host RNA Biosignatures in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2025Pooled it
- The immunosuppressive face of sepsis early on intensive care unit-A large-scale microarray meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Lysosome and Cytoskeleton Pathways Are Robustly Enriched in the Blood of Septic Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomic Data.Mediators of inflammation · 2015Pooled it
- Genome-wide association study of paediatric bacteraemia and sepsis.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- The Efficacy of IgM-Enriched Immunoglobulin (eIg) Administration for Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Surgical Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The immunology of sepsis: translating new insights into clinical practice.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Fever in Children with Cancer: Pathophysiological Insights Using Blood Transcriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Using Mendelian randomization provides genetic insights into potential targets for sepsis treatment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Septic Hyperinflammation-Is There a Role for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Techniques?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Molecular mechanisms of Sepsis attacking the immune system and solid organs.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Sepsis Outcome after Major Abdominal Surgery Does Not Seem to Be Improved by the Use of Pentameric Immunoglobulin IgM: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Transcriptome analysis of six tissues obtained post-mortem from sepsis patients.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- During Sepsis and COVID-19, the Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Responses Are Concomitant.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023Review
- The Role of Transcriptomics in Redefining Critical Illness.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Role of regulation of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Prospective multicentre study of host response signatures in neonatal sepsis in Sub Saharan Africa.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Proteomic changes associated with racial background and sepsis survival outcomes.Molecular omics · 2022Article
- Differential Gene Sets Profiling in Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Sepsis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis is thought to be an abnormal inflammatory response to infection. However, most clinical trials of drugs that modulate the inflammatory response of sepsis have been unsuccessful. Emerging genomic evidence shows that the host response in sepsis does not conform to a simple hyper-inflammatory/hypo-inflammatory model. We, therefore, synthesized current genomic studies that examined the host response of circulating leukocytes to human sepsis.
methodsElectronic searches were performed in Medline and Embase (1987 to October 2010), supplemented by additional searches in multiple microarray data repositories. We included studies that (1) used microarray, (2) were performed in humans and (3) investigated the host response mediated by circulating leukocytes.
resultsWe identified 12 cohorts consisting of 784 individuals providing genome-wide expression data in early and late sepsis. Sepsis elicited an immediate activation of pathogen recognition receptors, accompanied by an increase in the activities of signal transduction cascades. These changes were consistent across most cohorts. However, changes in inflammation related genes were highly variable. Established inflammatory markers, such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1 or interleukin-10, did not show any consistent pattern in their gene-expression across cohorts. The finding remains the same even after the cohorts were stratified by timing (early vs. late sepsis), patient groups (paediatric vs. adult patients) or settings (clinical sepsis vs. endotoxemia model). Neither a distinctive pro/anti-inflammatory phase nor a clear transition from a pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory phase could be observed during sepsis.
conclusionsSepsis related inflammatory changes are highly variable on a transcriptional level. We did not find strong genomic evidence that supports the classic two phase model of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.