Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21190574›Full record

Trial reportTrials2010

Cognitive behavioural therapy versus supportive therapy for persistent positive symptoms in psychotic disorders: the POSITIVE Study, a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.

Stefan Klingberg, Andreas Wittorf, Christoph Meisner, Wolfgang Wölwer, Georg Wiedemann, Jutta Herrlich, Andreas Bechdolf, Bernhard W Müller, Gudrun Sartory, Michael Wagner and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Supportive therapy for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The precuneus and the insula in self-attributional processes.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2013
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan KlingbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Germany. stefan.klingberg@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Andreas Wittorf
Christoph Meisner
Wolfgang Wölwer
Georg Wiedemann
Jutta Herrlich
Andreas Bechdolf
Bernhard W Müller
Gudrun Sartory
Michael Wagner
Tilo Kircher
Hans-Helmut König
Corinna Engel
Gerhard Buchkremer
University of Tübingen · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Wuppertal · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been demonstrated that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has a moderate effect on symptom reduction and on general well being of patients suffering from psychosis. However, questions regarding the specific efficacy of CBT, the treatment safety, the cost-effectiveness, and the moderators and mediators of treatment effects are still a major issue. The major objective of this trial is to investigate whether CBT is specifically efficacious in reducing positive symptoms when compared with non-specific supportive therapy (ST) which does not implement CBT-techniques but provides comparable therapeutic attention. METHODS/

designThe POSITIVE study is a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, parallel group, randomised clinical trial, comparing CBT and ST with respect to the efficacy in reducing positive symptoms in psychotic disorders. CBT as well as ST consist of 20 sessions altogether, 165 participants receiving CBT and 165 participants receiving ST. Major methodological aspects of the study are systematic recruitment, explicit inclusion criteria, reliability checks of assessments with control for rater shift, analysis by intention to treat, data management using remote data entry, measures of quality assurance (e.g. on-site monitoring with source data verification, regular query process), advanced statistical analysis, manualized treatment, checks of adherence and competence of therapists. Research relating the psychotherapy process with outcome, neurobiological research addressing basic questions of delusion formation using fMRI and neuropsychological assessment and treatment research investigating adaptations of CBT for adolescents is combined in this network. Problems of transfer into routine clinical care will be identified and addressed by a project focusing on cost efficiency. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial is part of efforts to intensify psychotherapy research in the field of psychosis in Germany, to contribute to the international discussion on psychotherapy in psychotic disorders, and to help implement psychotherapy in routine care. Furthermore, the study will allow drawing conclusions about the mediators of treatment effects of CBT of psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyClinical CompetenceClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesPsychotic DisordersResearch DesignSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID21190574
PMCPMC3022781
OpenAlexW2096436467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.