Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2011
The effect of different first 200-m pacing strategies on blood lactate and biomechanical parameters of the 400-m sprint.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood Lactate's Relationship with Step Kinematic Asymmetry, Stance-Phase Biomechanics, and Spring-Mass Model Variables at the Transition from Curve to Straight Sprinting in the 200 m Dash: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness Index of Mechanical Energy Utilization in Male 400-m Sprinters and the Relation Between Muscle Cross-Sectional Area of the Trunk and the Lower Limb.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Article
- Effect of pacing strategy modification on 200 m performance in athletics.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Kinematics of Two Special Endurance Trials: A Methodological Contribution to 400-m Performance.Journal of human kinetics · 2024Article
- Usefulness of V˙O2 Kinetics and Biomechanical Parameters as Predictors of Athlete's Performance in 800 m Running Race.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Problem of Effort Distribution in Heavy Glycolytic Trials with Special Reference to the 400 m Dash in Track and Field.Biology · 2022Review
- Sprinting with prosthetic versus biological legs: insight from experimental data.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Intra-athlete and inter-group comparisons: Running pace and step characteristics of elite athletes in the 400-m hurdles.PloS one · 2019Article
- Pacing Decision Making in Sport and the Effects of Interpersonal Competition: A Critical Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Review
- Pacing Profiles in Competitive Track Races: Regulation of Exercise Intensity Is Related to Cognitive Ability.Frontiers in physiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of three pacing strategies upon performance of the 400-m sprint. Eight healthy male physical education students participated in this study. Each participant performed a 200-m maximal test (200(MAX)) and three 400-m running tests in a random counterbalanced design. The 400-m tests were run with the first 200-m pace set at 98% (400(98%)), 95% (400(95%)), and 93% (400(93%)), respectively, of the effort for 200(MAX). The stimulation of the lactate system was assessed by post-test blood lactate concentration (BLa). Running speed (RS) was controlled with time-keeping devices. Stride frequency (SF), stride length (SL) and lower extremity kinematics were acquired with video cameras operating at 100 fps at the 125 and 380-m marks of the tests. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to identify modifications caused by the pacing strategies used. Non-significant differences were revealed for BLa. The fastest 400-m race was run in 400(93%), but performance was not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the examined pacing strategies. RS, SF and SL had significantly (p < 0.05) lower values in the 380-m mark when compared with the 125-m mark. In 400(98%), both SF and SL decreased by approximately 13%, while SF and SL dropped 2.4 and 9.2%, respectively, in 400(93%). In conclusion, lower peak BLa and less unfavorable modifications of running mechanics were recorded in 400(93%), where time differential between the halves of the 400-m race was smaller, which eventually resulted in better performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21190037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.