Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21187905›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2010

Combining network modeling and gene expression microarray analysis to explore the dynamics of Th1 and Th2 cell regulation.

Marco Pedicini, Fredrik Barrenäs, Trevor Clancy, Filippo Castiglione, Eivind Hovig, Kartiek Kanduri, Daniele Santoni, Mikael Benson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Computational modeling of heterogeneity and function of CD4+ T cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marco PediciniIstituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo Mauro Picone, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.
Fredrik Barrenäs
Trevor Clancy
Filippo Castiglione
Eivind Hovig
Kartiek Kanduri
Daniele Santoni
Mikael Benson
Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo Mauro Picone · ITNorwegian Cancer Society · NOUniversity of Gothenburg · SEDrottning Silvias barn- och ungdomssjukhus · SEInstitute for Research in Biomedicine · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two T helper (Th) cell subsets, namely Th1 and Th2 cells, play an important role in inflammatory diseases. The two subsets are thought to counter-regulate each other, and alterations in their balance result in different diseases. This paradigm has been challenged by recent clinical and experimental data. Because of the large number of genes involved in regulating Th1 and Th2 cells, assessment of this paradigm by modeling or experiments is difficult. Novel algorithms based on formal methods now permit the analysis of large gene regulatory networks. By combining these algorithms with in silico knockouts and gene expression microarray data from human T cells, we examined if the results were compatible with a counter-regulatory role of Th1 and Th2 cells. We constructed a directed network model of genes regulating Th1 and Th2 cells through text mining and manual curation. We identified four attractors in the network, three of which included genes that corresponded to Th0, Th1 and Th2 cells. The fourth attractor contained a mixture of Th1 and Th2 genes. We found that neither in silico knockouts of the Th1 and Th2 attractor genes nor gene expression microarray data from patients with immunological disorders and healthy subjects supported a counter-regulatory role of Th1 and Th2 cells. By combining network modeling with transcriptomic data analysis and in silico knockouts, we have devised a practical way to help unravel complex regulatory network topology and to increase our understanding of how network actions may differ in health and disease.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Knockout TechniquesHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeTh1 CellsTh2 Cells

Identifiers

PMID21187905
PMCPMC3002992
OpenAlexW2091570353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.