Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21187347›Full record

ReviewJournal of vision2010

Color and material perception: achievements and challenges.

Laurence T Maloney, David H Brainard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vision, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Discrimination of spectral reflectance under environmental illumination.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2018
    Article
  6. Perceptual gloss parameters are encoded by population responses in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural selectivity and representation of gloss in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurence T MaloneyDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA. ltm1@nyu.edu
David H Brainard

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
COLOR CONSTANCY--REAL IMAGES AND EARLY VISUAL MECHANISMSR01EY010016 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRAINARD, DAVID H. · 1998 to 2018
$5.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010016NEI NIH HHS R01 EY10016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large literature characterizing human perception of the lightness and color of matte surfaces arranged in coplanar arrays. In the past ten years researchers have begun to examine perception of lightness and color using wider ranges of stimuli intended to better approximate the conditions of everyday viewing. One emerging line of research concerns perception of lightness and color in scenes that approximate the three-dimensional environment we live in, with objects that need not be matte or coplanar and with geometrically complex illumination. A second concerns the perception of material surface properties other than color and lightness, such as gloss or roughness. This special issue features papers that address the rich set of questions and approaches that have emerged from these new research directions. Here, we briefly describe the articles in the issue and their relation to previous work.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID21187347
PMCPMC4456617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.