Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21186249›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2011

Genome-scale phylogenetics: inferring the plant tree of life from 18,896 gene trees.

J Gordon Burleigh, Mukul S Bansal, Oliver Eulenstein, Stefanie Hartmann, André Wehe, Todd J Vision

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Study of GUS Expression inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Are the duplication cost and Robinson-Foulds distance equivalent?Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J Gordon BurleighDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32609, USA. gburleigh@ufl.edu
Mukul S Bansal
Oliver Eulenstein
Stefanie Hartmann
André Wehe
Todd J Vision

Funding

Phylogenetic Analysis with Complex Genome Rearrangement EventsR01GM078991 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI TANG, JIJUN · 2006 to 2009
$715k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078991NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM078991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses using genome-scale data sets must confront incongruence among gene trees, which in plants is exacerbated by frequent gene duplications and losses. Gene tree parsimony (GTP) is a phylogenetic optimization criterion in which a species tree that minimizes the number of gene duplications induced among a set of gene trees is selected. The run time performance of previous implementations has limited its use on large-scale data sets. We used new software that incorporates recent algorithmic advances to examine the performance of GTP on a plant data set consisting of 18,896 gene trees containing 510,922 protein sequences from 136 plant taxa (giving a combined alignment length of >2.9 million characters). The relationships inferred from the GTP analysis were largely consistent with previous large-scale studies of backbone plant phylogeny and resolved some controversial nodes. The placement of taxa that were present in few gene trees generally varied the most among GTP bootstrap replicates. Excluding these taxa either before or after the GTP analysis revealed high levels of phylogenetic support across plants. The analyses supported magnoliids sister to a eudicot + monocot clade and did not support the eurosid I and II clades. This study presents a nuclear genomic perspective on the broad-scale phylogenic relationships among plants, and it demonstrates that nuclear genes with a history of duplication and loss can be phylogenetically informative for resolving the plant tree of life.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAlgorithmsClassificationExpressed Sequence TagsGenomicsPlants

Identifiers

PMID21186249
PMCPMC3038350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.