Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21185841›Full record

ReviewMutation research2011

Clustered DNA lesion repair in eukaryotes: relevance to mutagenesis and cell survival.

Evelyne Sage, Lynn Harrison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Influence of Oxidized Imino-Allantoin in the Presence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. The Cellular Response to Complex DNA Damage Induced by Ionising Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Evelyne SageInstitut Curie, Bât. 110, Centre Universitaire, 91405 Orsay, France.
Lynn Harrison
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · US

Funding

DNA REPAIR OF MULTIPLY DAMAGED SITES IN CELLSR01CA085693 · NCI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI HARRISON, LYNN · 2000 to 2010
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA085693NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A clustered DNA lesion, also known as a multiply damaged site, is defined as ≥ 2 damages in the DNA within 1-2 helical turns. Only ionizing radiation and certain chemicals introduce DNA damage in the genome in this non-random way. What is now clear is that the lethality of a damaging agent is not just related to the types of DNA lesions introduced, but also to how the damage is distributed in the DNA. Clustered DNA lesions were first hypothesized to exist in the 1990s, and work has progressed where these complex lesions have been characterized and measured in irradiated as well as in non-irradiated cells. A clustered lesion can consist of single as well as double strand breaks, base damage and abasic sites, and the damages can be situated on the same strand or opposing strands. They include tandem lesions, double strand break (DSB) clusters and non-DSB clusters, and base excision repair as well as the DSB repair pathways can be required to remove these complex lesions. Due to the plethora of oxidative damage induced by ionizing radiation, and the repair proteins involved in their removal from the DNA, it has been necessary to study how repair systems handle these lesions using synthetic DNA damage. This review focuses on the repair process and mutagenic consequences of clustered lesions in yeast and mammalian cells. By examining the studies on synthetic clustered lesions, and the effects of low vs high LET radiation on mammalian cells or tissues, it is possible to extrapolate the potential biological relevance of these clustered lesions to the killing of tumor cells by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and to the risk of cancer in non-tumor cells, and this will be discussed.

Indexed as

DNA RepairRadiation, IonizingAnimalsCell SurvivalDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedDNA DamageDNA, FungalMammalsMutagenesisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNADNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID21185841
PMCPMC3101299
OpenAlexW2052067242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.