Trial reportClinical drug investigation2011
Effects of nilotinib on single-dose warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a randomized, single-blind, two-period crossover study in healthy subjects.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Safety of Combining Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors with Anticoagulants in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review.Oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Lack of effect of Imrecoxib, an innovative and moderate COX-2 inhibitor, on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions when lenalidomide is co-administered with warfarin in a randomized clinical trial setting.Clinical drug investigation · 2015Trial
- Investigation of the effect of macitentan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy male subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Trial
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: focus on pyrimidines, pyridines and pyrroles.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveNilotinib (Tasigna®), a highly selective and potent BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) and the accelerated phase (CML-AP) in patients resistant or intolerant to prior therapy, including imatinib. Nilotinib has shown competitive inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP) 2C9 in vitro, but its effect on CYP2C9 activity in humans is unknown. This study evaluated the effects of nilotinib on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin, a sensitive CYP2C9 substrate, in healthy subjects.
methodsTwenty-four subjects (six female, 18 male, aged 21-65 years) were enrolled to receive a single oral dose of warfarin 25 mg with either a single oral dose of nilotinib 800 mg or matching placebo (all administered 30 minutes after consumption of a high-fat meal) in a crossover design. Serial blood samples were collected post-dose for determining serum concentrations of nilotinib and plasma concentrations of S- and R-warfarin. Prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) values were determined as pharmacodynamic measures of warfarin activity. CYP2C9 genotyping was performed in all subjects using TaqMan® assay.
resultsSixteen subjects were identified as CYP2C9 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and eight as intermediate metabolizers (IMs). There were no CYP2C9 poor metabolizers. Pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-warfarin were similar between the two treatments (warfarin + nilotinib vs warfarin alone) in both the EM and the IM groups. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for the maximum concentration in plasma (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) of S-warfarin in plasma in all subjects were 0.98 (0.95, 1.02) and 1.03 (0.99, 1.07), respectively, and for R-warfarin 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) and 1.02 (0.99, 1.04), respectively. Mean ratios for the maximum observed value and AUC from time zero to the last sampling time for PT were 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) and 1.00 (0.98, 1.02), respectively, and for the maximum observed value for INR and the AUC from time zero to the last sampling time for INR were 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) and 1.00 (0.99, 1.01), respectively. Mean ± SD serum nilotinib C(max) was 1872 ± 560 ng/mL, which is comparable to steady-state C(max) in CML and gastrointestinal stromal tumour patients receiving twice-daily 400 mg doses. Adverse events observed following either treatment were generally consistent with the known safety profiles of both drugs, and no new safety issues were observed.
conclusionThe study results demonstrate that nilotinib has no effect on single-dose warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. This implies that nilotinib is unlikely to inhibit CYP2C9 activity in human subjects. These findings suggest that warfarin and nilotinib may be used concurrently as needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.