ArticleInvestigational new drugs2012
New vandetanib analogs: fused tricyclic quinazolines with antiangiogenic potential.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the effect of vandetanib and celecoxib combination on angiogenesis.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023Article
- Investigation of Linarinic acid and one of its derivatives against cerebral ischemia in mice.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antiangiogenic effects of three novel anilinoquinazoline derivatives were studied with the aim to find new multi-kinase inhibitors as anticancer agents. The compounds are characterized by dioxolane, dioxane and dioxepine rings and bear the same aniline substituent in 4 position as vandetanib, known antiangiogenic agent. The in vitro assays were carried out on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), whereas in vivo angiogenesis was evaluated by means of Matrigel plug assay. The results showed that these compounds exert, even though to different extents, antiangiogenic activity affecting the various step of the process that leads to the formation of new blood vessels. At high concentrations they induced antiproliferative effects, whereas at non-cytotoxic concentrations they inhibited cell migration and the formation of tubular structures in Matrigel. In in vitro assays the dioxolane derivative 1 was more effective than vandetanib. Indeed, it inhibited the effects induced by exogenous VEGF and FGF-2 on both cell proliferation and morphogenesis, whereas vandetanib was completely ineffective. Moreover, all the compounds, as vandetanib, counteracted the FGF-2-induced increase in the hemoglobin content in the Matrigel plugs. Our results showed that all the three novel derivatives possess both in vitro and in vivo antiangiogenic activity, with compound 1 more effective than vandetanib to inhibit in vitro angiogenesis induced by exogenous cytokines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.