ArticleSurgical endoscopy2011
Laparoscopic proctectomy after neoadjuvant therapy: safety and long-term follow-up.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and factors contributing to the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe oncologic value of laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma is uncertain. Long-term data, particularly in tumors at higher risk of recurrence, is lacking. This study evaluated short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic proctectomy for locally advanced cancer (transmural and/or node positive) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of 50 consecutive patients with transmural and/or node-positive rectal cancer, from a single surgeon's practice, from 2001 to 2009. All patients were treated with neoadjuvant CRT. All cases were started laparoscopic or hand-assist.
resultsOf 50 patients, 58% were men, mean age was 60.9 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.3. The average distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 5.7 cm. All patients completed CRT, and the subsequent mean time to operation was 7.8 weeks. The conversion to open rate was 26%. Thirty-day mortality was 2%. Twenty-two percent had a complete response to CRT. Two patients had positive margins: one developed distant recurrence only, and the other died 2 years later without evidence of local recurrence. The average distal margin was 3.26 cm. The average lymph nodes resected was 11.9. Seven patients had an ileus that delayed discharge and one had a pelvic abscess. Median length of stay was 6 days. Three patients were readmitted within 30 days; all for dehydration. Mean follow-up was 2.72 years. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 5-year local recurrence rate was 9.6%, and the distant recurrence rate was 31%. Five-year disease-specific survival was 80% and overall survival was 68%.
conclusionsPatients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy can safely undergo laparoscopic proctectomy with a low rate of complications. Oncologic outcomes, including 5-year disease-free survival and local recurrence rates, are comparable to published reports of open proctectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.