ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2011
Forensic and genetic characterization of mtDNA from Pathans of Pakistan.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- West Eurasian mtDNA lineages in India: an insight into the spread of the Dravidian language and the origins of the caste system.Human genetics · 2015Trial
- Maternal lineage diversity and health-related haplogroups in the Gilgiti and Kohistani populations of northern Pakistan.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Ethnogenetic analysis reveals the Bronze Age genetic affiliation of Yashkuns with West Eurasians.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity and forensic application of Y-filer STRs in four major ethnic groups of Pakistan.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Contrasting maternal and paternal genetic histories among five ethnic groups from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Current pool of ultimate collection of mitochondrial DNA from remnants of Kalash.Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- Mitochondrial DNA diversity in the Khattak and Kheshgi of the Peshawar Valley, Pakistan.Genetica · 2020Article
- Article
- Haplogrouping mitochondrial DNA sequences in Legal Medicine/Forensic Genetics.International journal of legal medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complete mitochondrial control region data were generated for 230 unrelated Pathans from North West Frontier Province and Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan. To confirm data quality and to explore the genetic structure of Pathans, mitochondrial DNA haplogroup affiliation was determined by shared haplogroup-specific polymorphisms in the control region and by the analysis of diagnostic coding region single-nucleotide polymorphisms using a multiplex system for the assignment of eight haplogroups: M, N1'5, W, R, R0, T, J, and U. Sequence comparison revealed that 193 haplotypes were defined by 215 variable sites when major insertions were ignored at nucleotide positions 16193, 309, and 573. From a phylogenetic perspective, Pathans have a heterogeneous origin, displaying a high percentage of West Eurasian haplogroups followed by haplogroups native to South Asia and a small fraction from East Asian lineages. In population comparisons, this ethnic group differed significantly from several other ethnic groups from Pakistan and surrounding countries. These results suggest that frequency estimates for mtDNA haplotypes should be determined for endogamous ethnic groups individually instead of pooling data for these subpopulations into a single dataset for the Pakistani population. Data presented here may contribute to the accuracy of forensic mtDNA comparisons in the Pathans of Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21184092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.