ArticleWorld journal of surgery2011
Laparoscopic repeat resection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy versus conventional open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery.Scientific reports · 2017Trial
- Article
- Efficacy and prognostic factors of repeated hepatectomy for postoperative intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing initial hepatectomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Efficacy of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy compared with open repeat hepatectomy: a single-center, propensity score matching study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatectomy patients: inverse probability of treatment weighting.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Is minimally invasive liver surgery a reasonable option in recurrent HCC? A snapshot from the I Go MILS registry.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repeat liver resection and re-operation for liver tumor.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy is a more favorable treatment than open repeat hepatectomy for contralateral recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Fouling-resistant zwitterionic polymers for complete prevention of postoperative adhesion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Feasibility and efficacy of repeat laparoscopic liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic repeat liver resection.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Review
- Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent HCC: Comparison with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Recurrent HCC and Laparoscopic Resection for Primary HCC.World journal of surgery · 2019Article
- Multidisciplinary management of recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an international expert consensus.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2018Review
- The feasibility and efficacy of pure laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Status and perspective of laparoscopic repeat liver resection.World journal of hepatology · 2018Review
- Short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive repeat hepatectomy for recurrent liver cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study was designed to explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic re-resection of recurrent liver tumors.
methodsAmong 120 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received laparoscopic hepatectomy, six were carefully selected to receive laparoscopic re-resection. Surgical indications were evaluated by specific selection criteria for tumor location, size, metastases, vessel invasion, and liver function. Four patients received laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, and two received laparoscopic anatomical left lateral lobe resection. Results were analyzed retrospectively.
resultsThe six surgeries (four laparoscopic partial hepatectomies, two laparoscopic anatomical left lateral lobe resections) were successfully performed with no intraoperative complications. Mean operative time was 140.83 ± 35.69 min, mean blood loss was 283.33 ± 256.25 ml, and mean hospital stay was 5.67 ± 1.63 days.
conclusionsOur experience with carefully selected cases meeting specific criteria suggests that laparoscopic hepatic re-resection is a safe, feasible procedure that may offer multiple benefits for treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21184074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.